Service comparison

Cohere vs. Replicate

Cohere vs. Replicate — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 3 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Cohere Replicate Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 30 days
99.87%
100.00%
-0.13 pp
Last 90 days
99.78%
100.00%
-0.22 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Cohere minus Replicate). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Cohere

    3 total

    2 major 1 minor
    • Median resolution

      57m

    • Longest outage

      2h 54m

  • Replicate

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Cohere logo

    Cohere

    • Aug 5

      Documentation Content Loading Issues

      57m

      Major
    • Jul 23

      Dashboard Login Service Disruption

      50m

      Major
    • Jun 1

      /audio/transcriptions endpoint returns error for audio files with unexpected sampling rate

      2h 54m

      Minor
    • Apr 20

      Docs Platform Degraded Performance

      12m

      Major
    • Apr 13

      Multiple Model Disruptions

      1h 24m

      Minor
  • Replicate logo

    Replicate

    No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

Bottom line

Replicate wins

Replicate edges out on 90-day uptime.

Cohere posted 99.78% vs. 100.00% for Replicate (Δ -0.22 pp). Incidents: 3 vs. 0 (+3).

Where would your uptime rank against Replicate?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.