Service comparison

Hostinger vs. Contabo

Hostinger vs. Contabo — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 127 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Hostinger Contabo Δ
Last 24 hours
94.65%
100.00%
-5.35 pp
Last 7 days
94.57%
100.00%
-5.43 pp
Last 30 days
88.04%
100.00%
-11.96 pp
Last 90 days
52.83%
100.00%
-47.17 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Hostinger minus Contabo). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Hostinger

    127 total

    10 major 117 minor
    • Median resolution

      56m

    • Longest outage

      468h 6m

  • Contabo

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Hostinger logo

    Hostinger

    • Jul 20

      Emergency Server LT-1726 Maintenance

      1h 17m

      Minor
    • Jul 19

      Emergency Server sg-2115 Maintenance

      4h 38m

      Minor
    • Jul 19

      Emergency Server de-fra-pve-node1298 Maintenance

      6m

      Minor
    • Jul 18

      Degraded Server SG-142 Performance

      50m

      Minor
    • Jul 17

      Degraded Server IN-1495 Performance

      1h 11m

      Minor
  • Contabo logo

    Contabo

    No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

Bottom line

Contabo wins

Contabo edges out on 90-day uptime.

Hostinger posted 52.83% vs. 100.00% for Contabo (Δ -47.17 pp). Incidents: 127 vs. 0 (+127).

Monitor any service like this.

Pulsetic watches endpoints from 15+ global regions and alerts you before users notice.