Service comparison
Hugging Face vs. Cohere
Hugging Face vs. Cohere — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.
Last 90 days · 3 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring
Service comparison
Hugging Face vs. Cohere — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.
Last 90 days · 3 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring
Head-to-head
Hugging Face
huggingface.co
90-day uptime
100.00%
Incidents (90d)
0
0 major · 0 minor
Median resolution
—
Longest outage
—
Cohere
cohere.com
90-day uptime
99.78%
Incidents (90d)
3
2 major · 1 minor
Median resolution
57m
Longest outage
2h 54m
Uptime over time
| Window | Hugging Face | Cohere | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 24 hours |
|
|
0.00 pp |
| Last 7 days |
|
|
0.00 pp |
| Last 30 days |
|
|
+0.13 pp |
| Last 90 days |
|
|
+0.22 pp |
Δ is percentage-point difference (Hugging Face minus Cohere). Higher is better.
Incidents 90-day
Hugging Face
0 total
Median resolution
—
Longest outage
—
Cohere
3 total
Median resolution
57m
Longest outage
2h 54m
Recent activity
Hugging Face
No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.
Cohere
Documentation Content Loading Issues
57m
Dashboard Login Service Disruption
50m
/audio/transcriptions endpoint returns error for audio files with unexpected sampling rate
2h 54m
Docs Platform Degraded Performance
12m
Multiple Model Disruptions
1h 24m
Bottom line
Hugging Face winsHugging Face posted 100.00% vs. 99.78% for Cohere (Δ +0.22 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 3 (-3).
Also compare
Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.
10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.
Stay online, all the time, with Pulsetic's uptime prime.
By Designmodo
Designmodo Inc. 169 Madison Ave, #79627, New York, NY 10016, United States
Copyright © 2010-2026. Pulsetic® is a registered trademark.