Service comparison

OpenAI vs. Character AI

OpenAI vs. Character AI — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 146 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window OpenAI Character AI Δ
Last 24 hours
92.85%
100.00%
-7.15 pp
Last 7 days
92.63%
98.32%
-5.69 pp
Last 30 days
87.16%
98.29%
-11.13 pp
Last 90 days
85.61%
98.79%
-13.18 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (OpenAI minus Character AI). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • OpenAI

    65 total

    7 major 58 minor
    • Median resolution

      1h 29m

    • Longest outage

      139h

  • Character AI

    81 total

    81 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

      11m

    • Longest outage

      4h 49m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • OpenAI logo

    OpenAI

    • Jun 19

      chatgpt.com access issues

      1h 43m

      Minor
    • Jun 18

      SSO login errors for some ChatGPT Enterprise workspaces

      2h 59m

      Minor
    • Jun 18

      ChatGPT failing to load or save

      28m

      Minor
    • Jun 17

      Errors with conversations on Android and iOS devices

      1h 2m

      Major
    • Jun 16

      Codex "Selected Model is at Capacity" Error

      3h 16m

      Minor
  • Character AI logo

    Character AI

    • Jun 15

      Investigating an issue

      3m

      Major
    • Jun 15

      Investigating an issue

      9m

      Major
    • Jun 15

      Investigating an issue

      8m

      Major
    • Jun 15

      Investigating an issue

      8m

      Major
    • Jun 15

      Investigating an issue

      8m

      Major

Bottom line

Character AI wins

Character AI edges out on 90-day uptime.

OpenAI posted 85.61% vs. 98.79% for Character AI (Δ -13.18 pp). Incidents: 65 vs. 81 (-16).

Monitor any service like this.

Pulsetic watches endpoints from 15+ global regions and alerts you before users notice.