Service comparison

OpenAI vs. Character AI

OpenAI vs. Character AI — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 123 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window OpenAI Character AI Δ
Last 24 hours
98.61%
100.00%
-1.39 pp
Last 7 days
93.91%
100.00%
-6.09 pp
Last 30 days
80.41%
100.00%
-19.59 pp
Last 90 days
61.20%
99.43%
-38.23 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (OpenAI minus Character AI). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • OpenAI

    95 total

    12 major 83 minor
    • Median resolution

      1h 44m

    • Longest outage

      264h 55m

  • Character AI

    28 total

    28 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

      20m

    • Longest outage

      4h 49m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • OpenAI logo

    OpenAI

    • Aug 18

      Elevated errors deploying Sites

      20m

      Minor
    • Aug 14

      Unexpected GPT-5.6 Terra responses

      Ongoing

      Minor
    • Aug 13

      Elevated errors in ChatGPT conversations for Free users

      8h 38m

      Minor
    • Aug 13

      Error while creating custom RBAC roles for Enterprise users

      8h 23m

      Minor
    • Aug 11

      Increase in errors on API, Codex and Work Mode

      1h 7m

      Minor
  • Character AI logo

    Character AI

    • Jun 15

      Investigating an issue

      3m

      Major
    • Jun 15

      Investigating an issue

      9m

      Major
    • Jun 15

      Investigating an issue

      8m

      Major
    • Jun 15

      Investigating an issue

      8m

      Major
    • Jun 15

      Investigating an issue

      8m

      Major

Bottom line

Character AI wins

Character AI edges out on 90-day uptime.

OpenAI posted 61.20% vs. 99.43% for Character AI (Δ -38.23 pp). Incidents: 95 vs. 28 (+67).

Monitor any service like this.

Pulsetic watches endpoints from 15+ global regions and alerts you before users notice.