Service comparison

Replicate vs. Cohere

Replicate vs. Cohere — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 3 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Replicate Cohere Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
99.87%
+0.13 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
99.78%
+0.22 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Replicate minus Cohere). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Replicate

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

  • Cohere

    3 total

    2 major 1 minor
    • Median resolution

      57m

    • Longest outage

      2h 54m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Replicate logo

    Replicate

    No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

  • Cohere logo

    Cohere

    • Aug 5

      Documentation Content Loading Issues

      57m

      Major
    • Jul 23

      Dashboard Login Service Disruption

      50m

      Major
    • Jun 1

      /audio/transcriptions endpoint returns error for audio files with unexpected sampling rate

      2h 54m

      Minor
    • Apr 20

      Docs Platform Degraded Performance

      12m

      Major
    • Apr 13

      Multiple Model Disruptions

      1h 24m

      Minor

Bottom line

Replicate wins

Replicate edges out on 90-day uptime.

Replicate posted 100.00% vs. 99.78% for Cohere (Δ +0.22 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 3 (-3).

Where would your uptime rank against Replicate?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.