Service comparison
Turso vs. CockroachDB
Turso vs. CockroachDB — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.
Last 90 days · 3 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring
Service comparison
Turso vs. CockroachDB — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.
Last 90 days · 3 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring
Head-to-head
Turso
turso.tech
90-day uptime
100.00%
Incidents (90d)
0
0 major · 0 minor
Median resolution
—
Longest outage
—
90-day uptime
98.99%
Incidents (90d)
3
2 major · 1 minor
Median resolution
1h 16m
Longest outage
20h 3m
Uptime over time
| Window | Turso | CockroachDB | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 24 hours |
|
|
0.00 pp |
| Last 7 days |
|
|
0.00 pp |
| Last 30 days |
|
|
+2.78 pp |
| Last 90 days |
|
|
+1.01 pp |
Δ is percentage-point difference (Turso minus CockroachDB). Higher is better.
Incidents 90-day
Turso
0 total
Median resolution
—
Longest outage
—
CockroachDB
3 total
Median resolution
1h 16m
Longest outage
20h 3m
Recent activity
Turso
No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.
CockroachDB
Cluster connectivity and execution issues
20h 3m
Cluster Creation Failure
1h 16m
Unable to accept invites
36m
Degraded performance in one AWS us-east-1 availability zone
19h 40m
Cloud Console Social Login Auth Unavailable
39m
Bottom line
Turso winsTurso posted 100.00% vs. 98.99% for CockroachDB (Δ +1.01 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 3 (-3).
Also compare
Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.
10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.
Stay online, all the time, with Pulsetic's uptime prime.
By Designmodo
Designmodo Inc. 169 Madison Ave, #79627, New York, NY 10016, United States
Copyright © 2010-2026. Pulsetic® is a registered trademark.