Service comparison

Turso vs. CockroachDB

Turso vs. CockroachDB — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 3 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Turso CockroachDB Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
99.82%
+0.18 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
99.00%
+1.00 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Turso minus CockroachDB). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Turso

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

  • CockroachDB

    3 total

    2 major 1 minor
    • Median resolution

      1h 16m

    • Longest outage

      19h 40m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Turso logo

    Turso

    No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

  • CockroachDB logo

    CockroachDB

    • Jul 12

      Cluster Creation Failure

      1h 16m

      Major
    • Jun 9

      Unable to accept invites

      36m

      Minor
    • May 8

      Degraded performance in one AWS us-east-1 availability zone

      19h 40m

      Major
    • Mar 18

      Cloud Console Social Login Auth Unavailable

      39m

      Major
    • Mar 1

      Cluster unavailability and degraded cluster operations in AWS me-central...

      10d 4h 39m

      Minor

Bottom line

Turso wins

Turso edges out on 90-day uptime.

Turso posted 100.00% vs. 99.00% for CockroachDB (Δ +1.00 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 3 (-3).

Monitor any service like this.

Pulsetic watches endpoints from 15+ global regions and alerts you before users notice.