Service comparison

Vercel vs. Fly.io

Vercel vs. Fly.io — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 114 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Vercel Fly.io Δ
Last 24 hours
97.92%
100.00%
-2.08 pp
Last 7 days
97.20%
97.86%
-0.66 pp
Last 30 days
97.52%
87.09%
+10.43 pp
Last 90 days
95.11%
87.66%
+7.45 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Vercel minus Fly.io). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Vercel

    48 total

    7 major 41 minor
    • Median resolution

      58m

    • Longest outage

      12h 39m

  • Fly.io

    66 total

    30 major 36 minor
    • Median resolution

      1h 36m

    • Longest outage

      46h 6m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Vercel logo

    Vercel

    • Jul 15

      Errors accessing teams that require 2FA

      30m

      Minor
    • Jul 10

      Increased Build failure rates

      2h 6m

      Minor
    • Jul 10

      Erroneous budget notifications

      3h 20m

      Minor
    • Jul 9

      Delays loading Build Logs

      < 1m

      Minor
    • Jul 8

      Delays Processing Builds

      1h 8m

      Minor
  • Fly.io logo

    Fly.io

    • Jul 14

      Partial outage in SJC

      2h 7m

      Major
    • Jul 13

      Some DFW hosts offline

      33m

      Minor
    • Jul 9

      Registry performance issues

      31m

      Minor
    • Jul 9

      Delays starting Depot Builders in IAD

      56m

      Minor
    • Jul 3

      Partial Outage in ORD

      1h 11m

      Major

Bottom line

Vercel wins

Vercel edges out on 90-day uptime.

Vercel posted 95.11% vs. 87.66% for Fly.io (Δ +7.45 pp). Incidents: 48 vs. 66 (-18).

Monitor any service like this.

Pulsetic watches endpoints from 15+ global regions and alerts you before users notice.