Service comparison

Vercel vs. Fly.io

Vercel vs. Fly.io — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 108 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Vercel Fly.io Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
47.99%
+52.01 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
86.34%
+13.66 pp
Last 30 days
94.80%
94.48%
+0.32 pp
Last 90 days
95.40%
87.89%
+7.51 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Vercel minus Fly.io). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Vercel

    39 total

    8 major 31 minor
    • Median resolution

      1h 6m

    • Longest outage

      22h 48m

  • Fly.io

    69 total

    30 major 39 minor
    • Median resolution

      1h 38m

    • Longest outage

      46h 6m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Vercel logo

    Vercel

    • Jul 25

      Vercel Community temporarily unavailable

      22h 48m

      Minor
    • Jul 23

      Telemetry data loss for Drains

      < 1m

      Major
    • Jul 23

      Timeouts loading charts and observability data in Dashboard

      45m

      Major
    • Jul 23

      Dashboard authentication errors

      54m

      Major
    • Jul 17

      Increased invocation failures for Hobby Team functions

      1h 6m

      Minor
  • Fly.io logo

    Fly.io

    • Aug 4

      MPG creation is failing in GRU due to lack of capacity

      8h 19m

      Major
    • Aug 4

      Certificate issuance delays

      9h 4m

      Minor
    • Aug 3

      Inbound connection failure to Fly Apps

      3h 33m

      Major
    • Aug 1

      Managed Postgres v2 control plane issues in iad

      1h 28m

      Minor
    • Jul 31

      Capacity issues in CDG

      3h 27m

      Minor

Bottom line

Vercel wins

Vercel edges out on 90-day uptime.

Vercel posted 95.40% vs. 87.89% for Fly.io (Δ +7.51 pp). Incidents: 39 vs. 69 (-30).

Monitor any service like this.

Pulsetic watches endpoints from 15+ global regions and alerts you before users notice.