Service comparison

Vultr vs. Linode

Vultr vs. Linode — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 34 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Vultr Linode Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
81.46%
+18.54 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
81.34%
+18.66 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
71.81%
+28.19 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
68.33%
+31.67 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Vultr minus Linode). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Vultr

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

  • Linode

    34 total

    3 major 31 minor
    • Median resolution

      4h 38m

    • Longest outage

      162h 9m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Vultr logo

    Vultr

    No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

  • Linode logo

    Linode

    • Jun 30

      Service Issue - Block Storage - Singapore Expansion, SP (sg-sin-2)

      4h 27m

      Minor
    • Jun 26

      Service Issue - ACLP Metrics

      Ongoing

      Minor
    • Jun 26

      Connectivity Issue - US-IAD

      2h 18m

      Minor
    • Jun 25

      Emerging Service Issue - Migrations

      4h 8m

      Minor
    • Jun 24

      Emerging Service Issue - GPU Instances - All Regions

      1d 36m

      Minor

Bottom line

Vultr wins

Vultr edges out on 90-day uptime.

Vultr posted 100.00% vs. 68.33% for Linode (Δ +31.67 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 34 (-34).

Monitor any service like this.

Pulsetic watches endpoints from 15+ global regions and alerts you before users notice.