Service comparison

Vultr vs. Linode

Vultr vs. Linode — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 32 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Vultr Linode Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
71.32%
+28.68 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
93.69%
+6.31 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
46.80%
+53.20 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
58.62%
+41.38 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Vultr minus Linode). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Vultr

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

  • Linode

    32 total

    0 major 32 minor
    • Median resolution

      3h 43m

    • Longest outage

      282h 51m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Vultr logo

    Vultr

    No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

  • Linode logo

    Linode

    • Aug 28

      Service Issue - US-SEA (Seattle, WA)

      7h 18m

      Minor
    • Aug 24

      Service Issue - Object Storage - US-SEA

      3h 18m

      Minor
    • Aug 21

      Service Issue - US-SEA (Seattle, WA)

      4h 35m

      Minor
    • Aug 14

      Connectivity Issue - IT-MIL (Milan) data center

      1h 17m

      Minor
    • Aug 13

      Service Issue - Linode Kubernetes Engine Enterprise (LKE-E)- IAD2 (Washington)

      2h 11m

      Minor

Bottom line

Vultr wins

Vultr edges out on 90-day uptime.

Vultr posted 100.00% vs. 58.62% for Linode (Δ +41.38 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 32 (-32).

Where would your uptime rank against Vultr?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.