Service comparison

Vultr vs. Linode

Vultr vs. Linode — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 35 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Vultr Linode Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
93.81%
+6.19 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
41.09%
+58.91 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
19.41%
+80.59 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Vultr minus Linode). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Vultr

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

  • Linode

    35 total

    0 major 35 minor
    • Median resolution

      4h 27m

    • Longest outage

      1417h

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Vultr logo

    Vultr

    No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

  • Linode logo

    Linode

    • Jul 20

      Connectivity Issue - Linodes in Milan, Italy

      2h 18m

      Minor
    • Jul 18

      Service Issue - Object Storage

      1h 1m

      Minor
    • Jul 16

      Connectivity Issue - US-MIA (Miami

      < 1m

      Minor
    • Jul 14

      Service Issue - Linode API/CLI

      7h 5m

      Minor
    • Jul 13

      Service Issue - Host Jobs - All Regions

      1h 24m

      Minor

Bottom line

Vultr wins

Vultr edges out on 90-day uptime.

Vultr posted 100.00% vs. 19.41% for Linode (Δ +80.59 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 35 (-35).

Monitor any service like this.

Pulsetic watches endpoints from 15+ global regions and alerts you before users notice.