Service comparison

WorkOS vs. GitHub

WorkOS vs. GitHub — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 88 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window WorkOS GitHub Δ
Last 24 hours
83.54%
100.00%
-16.46 pp
Last 7 days
97.65%
98.29%
-0.64 pp
Last 30 days
99.22%
93.13%
+6.09 pp
Last 90 days
99.22%
89.55%
+9.67 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (WorkOS minus GitHub). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • WorkOS

    16 total

    6 major 10 minor
    • Median resolution

      35m

    • Longest outage

      3h 57m

  • GitHub

    72 total

    26 major 46 minor
    • Median resolution

      1h 27m

    • Longest outage

      61h 57m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • WorkOS logo

    WorkOS

    • Jun 22

      Elevated API Errors

      3h 57m

      Minor
    • Jun 9

      SSO Request Latency

      < 1m

      Minor
    • Jun 4

      Email delivery delays

      1h 26m

      Major
    • May 28

      Elevated Events API Errors

      15m

      Minor
    • May 22

      Dashboard and Docs unavailable

      29m

      Minor
  • GitHub logo

    GitHub

    • Jun 17

      Incident With Webhooks

      < 1m

      Minor
    • Jun 17

      Disruption with Copilot next edit suggestions

      1h 30m

      Minor
    • Jun 17

      Incident with Copilot Availability

      53m

      Major
    • Jun 16

      Disruption with some GitHub services

      29m

      Major
    • Jun 15

      Multiple services have elevated errors and endpoint failures when checking feature flags

      38m

      Minor

Bottom line

WorkOS wins

WorkOS edges out on 90-day uptime.

WorkOS posted 99.22% vs. 89.55% for GitHub (Δ +9.67 pp). Incidents: 16 vs. 72 (-56).

Monitor any service like this.

Pulsetic watches endpoints from 15+ global regions and alerts you before users notice.