Service comparison

Liquid Web vs. Contabo

Liquid Web vs. Contabo — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 18 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Liquid Web Contabo Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
98.31%
100.00%
-1.69 pp
Last 30 days
75.01%
100.00%
-24.99 pp
Last 90 days
50.54%
100.00%
-49.46 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Liquid Web minus Contabo). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Liquid Web

    18 total

    9 major 9 minor
    • Median resolution

      20h 4m

    • Longest outage

      623h 37m

  • Contabo

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Liquid Web logo

    Liquid Web

    • Jun 26

      Security Advisory: Update Avada Builder and UpdraftPlus WordPress Plugins Immediately

      Ongoing

      Minor
    • Jun 24

      Network Service Impact, Subset of Services, DC3

      2h 50m

      Major
    • Jun 18

      Monitoring Service Degradation

      Ongoing

      Minor
    • Jun 6

      Monitoring Service Degradation

      1d 4h 3m

      Minor
    • May 27

      Phone System Issues

      3h 53m

      Major
  • Contabo logo

    Contabo

    No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

Bottom line

Contabo wins

Contabo edges out on 90-day uptime.

Liquid Web posted 50.54% vs. 100.00% for Contabo (Δ -49.46 pp). Incidents: 18 vs. 0 (+18).

Monitor any service like this.

Pulsetic watches endpoints from 15+ global regions and alerts you before users notice.