Service comparison

4me vs. Aha!

4me vs. Aha! — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 2 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

4me

4me.com

Online
- 90-day uptime
  
  100.00%
- Incidents (90d)
  
  0
  
  0 major · 0 minor
- Median resolution
  
  —
- Longest outage
  
  —
View status page →
Aha!

aha.io

Online
- 90-day uptime
  
  99.96%
- Incidents (90d)
  
  2
  
  0 major · 2 minor
- Median resolution
  
  24m
- Longest outage
  
  48m
View status page →

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window	4me	Aha!	Δ
Last 24 hours	100.00%	100.00%	0.00 pp
Last 7 days	100.00%	100.00%	0.00 pp
Last 30 days	100.00%	100.00%	0.00 pp
Last 90 days	100.00%	99.96%	+0.04 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (4me minus Aha!). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

4me

0 total

0 major 0 minor
- Median resolution
  
  —
- Longest outage
  
  —
Aha!

2 total

0 major 2 minor
- Median resolution
  
  24m
- Longest outage
  
  48m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

4me

No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.
Aha!
- Aug 27
  
  Slow performance for some users
  
  < 1m
  
  Minor
- Jul 28
  
  Degraded performance for some customers.
  
  48m
  
  Minor
- Feb 18
  
  Slow performance for some customers
  
  1h 1m
  
  Major
- Feb 10
  
  Elevated Error Rates for some customers
  
  < 1m
  
  Minor
- Feb 3
  
  Slow performance for Aha! App
  
  4h 3m
  
  Minor
View all incidents →

Bottom line

It's a tie

4me and Aha! are evenly matched on uptime.

4me posted 100.00% vs. 99.96% for Aha! (Δ +0.04 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 2 (-2).

Also compare

Other 4me comparisons

Where would your own uptime land?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.

Measure Yours