Service comparison

4me vs. airfocus

4me vs. airfocus — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 0 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

4me

4me.com

Online
- 90-day uptime
  
  100.00%
- Incidents (90d)
  
  0
  
  0 major · 0 minor
- Median resolution
  
  —
- Longest outage
  
  —
View status page →
airfocus

airfocus.com

Online
- 90-day uptime
  
  100.00%
- Incidents (90d)
  
  0
  
  0 major · 0 minor
- Median resolution
  
  —
- Longest outage
  
  —
View status page →

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window	4me	airfocus	Δ
Last 24 hours	100.00%	100.00%	0.00 pp
Last 7 days	100.00%	100.00%	0.00 pp
Last 30 days	100.00%	100.00%	0.00 pp
Last 90 days	100.00%	100.00%	0.00 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (4me minus airfocus). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

4me

0 total

0 major 0 minor
- Median resolution
  
  —
- Longest outage
  
  —
airfocus

0 total

0 major 0 minor
- Median resolution
  
  —
- Longest outage
  
  —

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

4me

No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.
airfocus
- Dec 15
  
  Homepage - Help Center
  
  < 1m
  
  Minor
- Nov 21
  
  Production US (AWS) - Portal
  
  < 1m
  
  Minor
- Oct 22
  
  Homepage - Help Center
  
  < 1m
  
  Minor
- Oct 20
  
  Homepage - Help Center
  
  < 1m
  
  Minor
- Oct 14
  
  Production EU (Hetzner) - Portal
  
  < 1m
  
  Minor
View all incidents →

Bottom line

It's a tie

4me and airfocus are evenly matched on uptime.

4me posted 100.00% vs. 100.00% for airfocus (Δ 0.00 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 0 (0).

Also compare

Other 4me comparisons

Where would your own uptime land?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.

Measure Yours