Service comparison

4me vs. AppFox

4me vs. AppFox: uptime, incident frequency and resolution times, head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 1 incident total · From each provider's official status page

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window 4me AppFox Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
99.99%
+0.01 pp

Uptime is the share of each window with no incident open on the provider's official status page. Δ is percentage-point difference (4me minus AppFox). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • 4me

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

      —

    • Longest incident

      —

  • AppFox

    1 total

    1 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

      17m

    • Longest incident

      17m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • 4me logo

    4me

    No incidents on record.

  • AppFox logo

    AppFox

    • Jul 15

      Unable to load Workflows byline and some macros

      17m

      Major
    • Apr 15

      Workflows for Confluence - Macros showing with "Broken macro" message

      55d 20h 26m

      Minor
    • Feb 6

      Scheduled Triggers not working for Atlassian Forge apps

      1h 40m

      Major
    • Jan 28

      All apps affected by an incident on the Atlassian side affecting Forge functions

      15h 51m

      Major
    • Jan 7

      Approval Quorum Issue

      3h 46m

      Major

Bottom line

It's a tie

4me and AppFox are evenly matched on uptime.

4me posted 100.00% vs. 99.99% for AppFox (Δ +0.01 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 1 (-1).

Where would your own uptime land?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Aim it at a website you run and build a 90-day record of your own.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.