Service comparison
4me vs. Apptio Targetprocess
4me vs. Apptio Targetprocess: uptime, incident frequency and resolution times, head-to-head.
Last 90 days · 8 incidents total · From each provider's official status page
Service comparison
4me vs. Apptio Targetprocess: uptime, incident frequency and resolution times, head-to-head.
Last 90 days · 8 incidents total · From each provider's official status page
Head-to-head
4me
4me.com
90-day uptime
100.00%
Incidents (90d)
0
0 major · 0 minor
Median resolution
—
Longest incident
—
90-day uptime
98.45%
Incidents (90d)
8
4 major · 4 minor
Median resolution
2h 23m
Longest incident
18h 2m
Uptime over time
| Window | 4me | Apptio Targetprocess | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 24 hours |
|
|
0.00 pp |
| Last 7 days |
|
|
+11.14 pp |
| Last 30 days |
|
|
+4.30 pp |
| Last 90 days |
|
|
+1.55 pp |
Uptime is the share of each window with no incident open on the provider's official status page. Δ is percentage-point difference (4me minus Apptio Targetprocess). Higher is better.
Incidents 90-day
4me
0 total
Median resolution
—
Longest incident
—
Apptio Targetprocess
8 total
Median resolution
2h 23m
Longest incident
18h 2m
Recent activity
4me
No incidents on record.
Apptio Targetprocess
Search service issue in EU2 cluster
18h 2m
History event based Automation Rules are not triggered
41m
CSV Export functionality for Views is unavailable - US and APAC regions
20m
Automation rules are not getting triggered in US2 cluster for some accounts
3h 3m
Salesforce Outage - Support Case Access Impacted
6h 9m
Bottom line
4me wins4me posted 100.00% vs. 98.45% for Apptio Targetprocess (Δ +1.55 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 8 (-8).
Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Aim it at a website you run and build a 90-day record of your own.
10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.
Stay online, all the time, with Pulsetic's uptime prime.
By Designmodo
Designmodo Inc. 169 Madison Ave, #79627, New York, NY 10016, United States
Copyright © 2010-2026. Pulsetic® is a registered trademark.