Service comparison

4me vs. Apptio Targetprocess

4me vs. Apptio Targetprocess: uptime, incident frequency and resolution times, head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 8 incidents total · From each provider's official status page

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window 4me Apptio Targetprocess Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
88.86%
+11.14 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
95.70%
+4.30 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
98.45%
+1.55 pp

Uptime is the share of each window with no incident open on the provider's official status page. Δ is percentage-point difference (4me minus Apptio Targetprocess). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • 4me

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

      —

    • Longest incident

      —

  • Apptio Targetprocess

    8 total

    4 major 4 minor
    • Median resolution

      2h 23m

    • Longest incident

      18h 2m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • 4me logo

    4me

    No incidents on record.

  • Apptio Targetprocess logo

    Apptio Targetprocess

    • Oct 5

      Search service issue in EU2 cluster

      18h 2m

      Minor
    • Oct 2

      History event based Automation Rules are not triggered

      41m

      Major
    • Sep 17

      CSV Export functionality for Views is unavailable - US and APAC regions

      20m

      Major
    • Sep 16

      Automation rules are not getting triggered in US2 cluster for some accounts

      3h 3m

      Major
    • Sep 16

      Salesforce Outage - Support Case Access Impacted

      6h 9m

      Minor

Bottom line

4me wins

4me edges out on 90-day uptime.

4me posted 100.00% vs. 98.45% for Apptio Targetprocess (Δ +1.55 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 8 (-8).

Where would your uptime rank against 4me?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Aim it at a website you run and build a 90-day record of your own.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.