Service comparison
4me vs. Apptio Targetprocess
4me vs. Apptio Targetprocess — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.
Last 90 days · 6 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring
Service comparison
4me vs. Apptio Targetprocess — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.
Last 90 days · 6 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring
Head-to-head
4me
4me.com
90-day uptime
100.00%
Incidents (90d)
0
0 major · 0 minor
Median resolution
—
Longest outage
—
90-day uptime
99.32%
Incidents (90d)
6
3 major · 3 minor
Median resolution
2h 23m
Longest outage
6h 9m
Uptime over time
| Window | 4me | Apptio Targetprocess | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 24 hours |
|
|
+1.39 pp |
| Last 7 days |
|
|
+4.61 pp |
| Last 30 days |
|
|
+1.70 pp |
| Last 90 days |
|
|
+0.68 pp |
Δ is percentage-point difference (4me minus Apptio Targetprocess). Higher is better.
Incidents 90-day
4me
0 total
Median resolution
—
Longest outage
—
Apptio Targetprocess
6 total
Median resolution
2h 23m
Longest outage
6h 9m
Recent activity
4me
No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.
Apptio Targetprocess
CSV Export functionality for Views is unavailable - US and APAC regions
20m
Automation rules are not getting triggered in US2 cluster for some accounts
3h 3m
Salesforce Outage - Support Case Access Impacted
6h 9m
Search service issue in EU2 cluster
4h 31m
US Frontdoor authentication errors
41m
Bottom line
4me wins4me posted 100.00% vs. 99.32% for Apptio Targetprocess (Δ +0.68 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 6 (-6).
Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.
10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.
Stay online, all the time, with Pulsetic's uptime prime.
By Designmodo
Designmodo Inc. 169 Madison Ave, #79627, New York, NY 10016, United States
Copyright © 2010-2026. Pulsetic® is a registered trademark.