Service comparison

Accelerant vs. Aitoearn

Accelerant vs. Aitoearn — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 5 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Accelerant Aitoearn Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Accelerant minus Aitoearn). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Accelerant

    1 total

    1 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

      59m

    • Longest outage

      59m

  • Aitoearn

    4 total

    3 major 1 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Accelerant logo

    Accelerant

    • Jul 13

      Platform screens partially loading

      59m

      Major
    • May 13

      Errors on analytics dashboards

      1h 14m

      Major
  • Aitoearn logo

    Aitoearn

    • Jul 6

      66666

      Ongoing

      Major
    • Jul 6

      Component status change (partial outage)

      Ongoing

      Major
    • Jul 6

      斤斤计较

      Ongoing

      Minor
    • Jul 6

      测试变更说明标题

      Ongoing

      Major
    • Aug 14

      Rednote not working

      Ongoing

      Major

Bottom line

It's a tie

Accelerant and Aitoearn are evenly matched on uptime.

Accelerant posted 100.00% vs. 100.00% for Aitoearn (Δ 0.00 pp). Incidents: 1 vs. 4 (-3).

Where would your own uptime land?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.