Service comparison
Acquired vs. Anedot
Acquired vs. Anedot — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.
Last 90 days · 11 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring
Service comparison
Acquired vs. Anedot — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.
Last 90 days · 11 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring
Head-to-head
Acquired
acquired.com
90-day uptime
98.35%
Incidents (90d)
11
3 major · 8 minor
Median resolution
1h 19m
Longest outage
15h 6m
Anedot
anedot.com
90-day uptime
100.00%
Incidents (90d)
0
0 major · 0 minor
Median resolution
—
Longest outage
—
Uptime over time
| Window | Acquired | Anedot | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 24 hours |
|
|
0.00 pp |
| Last 7 days |
|
|
-0.19 pp |
| Last 30 days |
|
|
-2.77 pp |
| Last 90 days |
|
|
-1.65 pp |
Δ is percentage-point difference (Acquired minus Anedot). Higher is better.
Incidents 90-day
Acquired
11 total
Median resolution
1h 19m
Longest outage
15h 6m
Anedot
0 total
Median resolution
—
Longest outage
—
Recent activity
Acquired
Elevated Declined Transactions
19m
We are currently investigating elevated failure rates affecting card payments
1h 19m
3DS & Network Token Issue With Mastercard Transactions
15h 6m
Degraded card processing via Trust Payments
4h 30m
Intermittent 3DS issues
41m
Anedot
No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.
Bottom line
Anedot winsAcquired posted 98.35% vs. 100.00% for Anedot (Δ -1.65 pp). Incidents: 11 vs. 0 (+11).
Also compare
Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.
10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.
Stay online, all the time, with Pulsetic's uptime prime.
By Designmodo
Designmodo Inc. 169 Madison Ave, #79627, New York, NY 10016, United States
Copyright © 2010-2026. Pulsetic® is a registered trademark.