Service comparison

Acquired vs. Anedot

Acquired vs. Anedot — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 11 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Acquired Anedot Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
99.81%
100.00%
-0.19 pp
Last 30 days
97.23%
100.00%
-2.77 pp
Last 90 days
98.35%
100.00%
-1.65 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Acquired minus Anedot). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Acquired

    11 total

    3 major 8 minor
    • Median resolution

      1h 19m

    • Longest outage

      15h 6m

  • Anedot

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Acquired logo

    Acquired

    • Sep 11

      Elevated Declined Transactions

      19m

      Minor
    • Sep 4

      We are currently investigating elevated failure rates affecting card payments

      1h 19m

      Minor
    • Sep 3

      3DS & Network Token Issue With Mastercard Transactions

      15h 6m

      Minor
    • Aug 27

      Degraded card processing via Trust Payments

      4h 30m

      Minor
    • Aug 18

      Intermittent 3DS issues

      41m

      Minor
  • Anedot logo

    Anedot

    No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

Bottom line

Anedot wins

Anedot edges out on 90-day uptime.

Acquired posted 98.35% vs. 100.00% for Anedot (Δ -1.65 pp). Incidents: 11 vs. 0 (+11).

Where would your uptime rank against Anedot?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.