Service comparison

Action Marketing vs. ActiveCampaign

Action Marketing vs. ActiveCampaign — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 10 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Action Marketing ActiveCampaign Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
99.74%
+0.26 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
99.88%
+0.12 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
92.45%
+7.55 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Action Marketing minus ActiveCampaign). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Action Marketing

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

  • ActiveCampaign

    10 total

    6 major 4 minor
    • Median resolution

      1h 17m

    • Longest outage

      129h 4m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Action Marketing logo

    Action Marketing

    No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

  • ActiveCampaign logo

    ActiveCampaign

    • Sep 14

      Bulk Edit of contacts is not applying filters.

      26m

      Major
    • Aug 28

      Issues Accessing Accounts

      28m

      Major
    • Aug 10

      Issue impacting customer logins for a portion of users

      2h 44m

      Major
    • Aug 5

      Issue Affecting Segmented Campaigns in the EU Region

      1d 41m

      Major
    • Aug 3

      Engineers are researching an issue that may caused some customer reports to intermittently not load.

      1h 50m

      Minor

Bottom line

Action Marketing wins

Action Marketing edges out on 90-day uptime.

Action Marketing posted 100.00% vs. 92.45% for ActiveCampaign (Δ +7.55 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 10 (-10).

Where would your uptime rank against Action Marketing?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.