Service comparison

Action Marketing vs. ActiveCampaign

Action Marketing vs. ActiveCampaign: uptime, incident frequency and resolution times, head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 9 incidents total · From each provider's official status page

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Action Marketing ActiveCampaign Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
99.41%
+0.59 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
98.32%
+1.68 pp

Uptime is the share of each window with no incident open on the provider's official status page. Δ is percentage-point difference (Action Marketing minus ActiveCampaign). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Action Marketing

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

      —

    • Longest incident

      —

  • ActiveCampaign

    9 total

    7 major 2 minor
    • Median resolution

      1h 36m

    • Longest incident

      24h 41m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Action Marketing logo

    Action Marketing

    No incidents on record.

  • ActiveCampaign logo

    ActiveCampaign

    • Oct 8

      Whatsapp message responses delayed

      Ongoing

      Major
    • Sep 28

      Transactional Email Failures

      3h 50m

      Major
    • Sep 14

      Bulk Edit of contacts is not applying filters.

      26m

      Major
    • Aug 28

      Issues Accessing Accounts

      28m

      Major
    • Aug 10

      Issue impacting customer logins for a portion of users

      2h 44m

      Major

Bottom line

Action Marketing wins

Action Marketing edges out on 90-day uptime.

Action Marketing posted 100.00% vs. 98.32% for ActiveCampaign (Δ +1.68 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 9 (-9).

Where would your uptime rank against Action Marketing?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Aim it at a website you run and build a 90-day record of your own.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.