Website Monitoring RUMNew Dependency MonitoringNew SSL Monitoring Ping Monitoring Port Monitoring Domain Monitoring TCP Monitoring Keyword Monitoring Cron Monitoring API Monitoring SLA Monitoring Monitor ScreenshotsNew AnnotationsNew
Status Pages Status Badges Status Page Translation Is Website Down? API AI AssistantNew MCP Server Integrations
For SaaS Teams For Agencies For E-commerce For DevOps For Startups For Hosting Providers For Developers

Service comparison

AICord vs. Groq

AICord vs. Groq: uptime, incident frequency and resolution times, head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 0 incidents total · From each provider's official status page

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window AICord Groq Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp

Uptime is the share of each window with no incident open on the provider's official status page. Δ is percentage-point difference (AICord minus Groq). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • AICord

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor

    • Median resolution

      —

    • Longest incident

      —

  • Groq

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor

    • Median resolution

      —

    • Longest incident

      —

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • AICord logo

    AICord

    • May 10, 2025

      Bot manager infrastructure down

      124d 5h 47m

      Major
    • Aug 16, 2024

      Maintenance

      2d 23h 41m

      Minor
    • Aug 14, 2024

      Migration to a new data center

      1d 22h 53m

      Major
    • Jun 19, 2024

      Dashboard is suspended by Render's greed

      57d 19h 24m

      Major
    • May 19, 2024

      Dashboard not working

      30d 22h 49m

      Major
    View all incidents →
  • Groq logo

    Groq

    • Jul 1

      Data Center Failure Impacting Capacity

      1h 33m

      Minor
    • Mar 19

      openai/gpt-oss-120b Performance Issue

      59m

      Minor
    • Feb 7

      meta-llama/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct Degraded Performance

      1h 32m

      Minor
    • Feb 5

      meta-llama/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct Degraded Performance

      23m

      Minor
    • Feb 5

      meta-llama/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct Degraded Performance

      1h 44m

      Minor
    View all incidents →

Bottom line

It's a tie

AICord and Groq are evenly matched on uptime.

AICord posted 100.00% vs. 100.00% for Groq (Δ 0.00 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 0 (0).

Also compare

Other AICord comparisons

Where would your own uptime land?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Aim it at a website you run and build a 90-day record of your own.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.

Measure Yours

Stay online, all the time, with Pulsetic's uptime prime.

By Designmodo

Designmodo Inc. 169 Madison Ave, #79627, New York, NY 10016, United States

Copyright © 2010-2026. Pulsetic® is a registered trademark.