Service comparison

Asana vs. Linear

Asana vs. Linear — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 3 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Asana Linear Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
99.66%
100.00%
-0.34 pp
Last 30 days
99.92%
100.00%
-0.08 pp
Last 90 days
99.97%
100.00%
-0.03 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Asana minus Linear). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Asana

    3 total

    1 major 2 minor
    • Median resolution

      0m

    • Longest outage

      34m

  • Linear

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Asana logo

    Asana

    • Jul 7

      Errors loading the Asana web app for some users in US

      34m

      Major
    • Apr 21

      Date Time Trigger Automation Failues

      < 1m

      Minor
    • Apr 20

      Notifications and Background Actions delayed in EU

      < 1m

      Minor
    • Mar 26

      Errors loading Asana

      3h 30m

      Minor
    • Mar 1

      AWS UAE issues might affect the ME region

      13d 9h 27m

      Minor
  • Linear logo

    Linear

    No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

Bottom line

It's a tie

Asana and Linear are evenly matched on uptime.

Asana posted 99.97% vs. 100.00% for Linear (Δ -0.03 pp). Incidents: 3 vs. 0 (+3).

Monitor any service like this.

Pulsetic watches endpoints from 15+ global regions and alerts you before users notice.