Service comparison

Asana vs. Linear

Asana vs. Linear: uptime, incident frequency and resolution times, head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 6 incidents total · From each provider's official status page

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Asana Linear Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 30 days
99.37%
100.00%
-0.63 pp
Last 90 days
99.76%
100.00%
-0.24 pp

Uptime is the share of each window with no incident open on the provider's official status page. Δ is percentage-point difference (Asana minus Linear). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Asana

    6 total

    3 major 3 minor
    • Median resolution

      39m

    • Longest incident

      2h 4m

  • Linear

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

      —

    • Longest incident

      —

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Asana logo

    Asana

    • Sep 21

      Automations not running for EU users

      1h 10m

      Minor
    • Sep 17

      Slow performance for a subset of Asana users

      36m

      Minor
    • Sep 2

      We are fully down for a subset of customers. We're investigating the issue, and are rolling back a deployment.

      41m

      Major
    • Aug 31

      Asana full outage for some users (2 hours, 25% outage)

      2h 4m

      Major
    • Aug 4

      Webhooks and event streams partial data loss

      < 1m

      Minor
  • Linear logo

    Linear

    No incidents on record.

Bottom line

Linear wins

Linear edges out on 90-day uptime.

Asana posted 99.76% vs. 100.00% for Linear (Δ -0.24 pp). Incidents: 6 vs. 0 (+6).

Where would your uptime rank against Linear?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Aim it at a website you run and build a 90-day record of your own.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.