Service comparison
AWeber vs. Cakemail
AWeber vs. Cakemail: uptime, incident frequency and resolution times, head-to-head.
Last 90 days · 1 incident total · From each provider's official status page
Service comparison
AWeber vs. Cakemail: uptime, incident frequency and resolution times, head-to-head.
Last 90 days · 1 incident total · From each provider's official status page
Head-to-head
AWeber
aweber.com
90-day uptime
99.97%
Incidents (90d)
1
0 major · 1 minor
Median resolution
35m
Longest incident
35m
Cakemail
cakemail.com
90-day uptime
100.00%
Incidents (90d)
0
0 major · 0 minor
Median resolution
—
Longest incident
—
Uptime over time
| Window | AWeber | Cakemail | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 24 hours |
|
|
0.00 pp |
| Last 7 days |
|
|
0.00 pp |
| Last 30 days |
|
|
0.00 pp |
| Last 90 days |
|
|
-0.03 pp |
Uptime is the share of each window with no incident open on the provider's official status page. Δ is percentage-point difference (AWeber minus Cakemail). Higher is better.
Incidents 90-day
AWeber
1 total
Median resolution
35m
Longest incident
35m
Cakemail
0 total
Median resolution
—
Longest incident
—
Recent activity
AWeber
Signup forms outage
35m
Unscheduled interruption
28m
Unscheduled interruption
20m
Unscheduled interruption
21m
Unscheduled interruption
2h 30m
Cakemail
No incidents on record.
Bottom line
It's a tieAWeber posted 99.97% vs. 100.00% for Cakemail (Δ -0.03 pp). Incidents: 1 vs. 0 (+1).
Also compare
Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Aim it at a website you run and build a 90-day record of your own.
10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.
Stay online, all the time, with Pulsetic's uptime prime.
By Designmodo
Designmodo Inc. 169 Madison Ave, #79627, New York, NY 10016, United States
Copyright © 2010-2026. Pulsetic® is a registered trademark.