Service comparison

Balsamiq vs. Figma

Balsamiq vs. Figma — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 2 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Balsamiq Figma Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
99.42%
+0.58 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
99.65%
+0.35 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Balsamiq minus Figma). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Balsamiq

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

  • Figma

    2 total

    1 major 1 minor
    • Median resolution

      3h 45m

    • Longest outage

      4h 10m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Balsamiq logo

    Balsamiq

    • Aug 22

      Service Disruption

      1h 9m

      Major
    • Apr 4

      Service down

      4h 8m

      Major
  • Figma logo

    Figma

    • Aug 26

      Figma MCP Disruption

      4h 10m

      Major
    • Jul 27

      Service Disruption

      3h 20m

      Minor
    • Jun 18

      Figma Make disruption - Gemini 3.1 Pro

      12h 53m

      Minor
    • Jun 16

      Figma Make and Agent Service Disruption

      1h 42m

      Minor
    • Apr 20

      Figma Make Service Disruption

      9h 8m

      Minor

Bottom line

Balsamiq wins

Balsamiq edges out on 90-day uptime.

Balsamiq posted 100.00% vs. 99.65% for Figma (Δ +0.35 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 2 (-2).

Where would your uptime rank against Balsamiq?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.