Service comparison

Clojars vs. Graphite

Clojars vs. Graphite — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 0 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Clojars Graphite Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Clojars minus Graphite). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Clojars

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

  • Graphite

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Clojars logo

    Clojars

    • Sep 3

      Major outage caused by DDoS at Linode Atlanta

      3d 5h 55m

      Major
    • Aug 30

      Upstream network outage at Linode

      2h 3m

      Major
    • Aug 5

      Clojars unavailable

      23m

      Minor
    • Apr 22

      Linode network outages

      3h 7m

      Minor
    • Mar 1

      Upstream network maintenance

      5m

      Minor
  • Graphite logo

    Graphite

    No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

Bottom line

It's a tie

Clojars and Graphite are evenly matched on uptime.

Clojars posted 100.00% vs. 100.00% for Graphite (Δ 0.00 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 0 (0).

Where would your own uptime land?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.