Service comparison

Clojars vs. Merge Freeze

Clojars vs. Merge Freeze — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 2 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Clojars Merge Freeze Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
99.23%
+0.77 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
99.82%
+0.18 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
99.94%
+0.06 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Clojars minus Merge Freeze). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Clojars

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

  • Merge Freeze

    2 total

    0 major 2 minor
    • Median resolution

      39m

    • Longest outage

      1h 18m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Clojars logo

    Clojars

    • Sep 3

      Major outage caused by DDoS at Linode Atlanta

      3d 5h 55m

      Major
    • Aug 30

      Upstream network outage at Linode

      2h 3m

      Major
    • Aug 5

      Clojars unavailable

      23m

      Minor
    • Apr 22

      Linode network outages

      3h 7m

      Minor
    • Mar 1

      Upstream network maintenance

      5m

      Minor
  • Merge Freeze logo

    Merge Freeze

    • Sep 16

      Slack

      1h 18m

      Minor
    • Aug 17

      GitHub outage

      < 1m

      Minor
    • Feb 9

      Degraded GitHub API and webhooks

      3h 14m

      Minor
    • Jan 22

      Slack outage

      57m

      Minor
    • Jan 22

      GitHub outage

      < 1m

      Minor

Bottom line

Clojars wins

Clojars edges out on 90-day uptime.

Clojars posted 100.00% vs. 99.94% for Merge Freeze (Δ +0.06 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 2 (-2).

Where would your uptime rank against Clojars?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.