Service comparison

CockroachDB vs. Turso

CockroachDB vs. Turso — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 3 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

CockroachDB

cockroachlabs.com

Online
- 90-day uptime
  
  99.03%
- Incidents (90d)
  
  3
  
  2 major · 1 minor
- Median resolution
  
  39m
- Longest outage
  
  19h 40m
View status page →
Turso

turso.tech

Online
- 90-day uptime
  
  100.00%
- Incidents (90d)
  
  0
  
  0 major · 0 minor
- Median resolution
  
  —
- Longest outage
  
  —
View status page →

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window	CockroachDB	Turso	Δ
Last 24 hours	97.50%	100.00%	-2.50 pp
Last 7 days	99.64%	100.00%	-0.36 pp
Last 30 days	99.92%	100.00%	-0.08 pp
Last 90 days	99.03%	100.00%	-0.97 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (CockroachDB minus Turso). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

CockroachDB

3 total

2 major 1 minor
- Median resolution
  
  39m
- Longest outage
  
  19h 40m
Turso

0 total

0 major 0 minor
- Median resolution
  
  —
- Longest outage
  
  —

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

CockroachDB
- Jun 9
  
  Unable to accept invites
  
  36m
  
  Minor
- May 8
  
  Degraded performance in one AWS us-east-1 availability zone
  
  19h 40m
  
  Major
- Mar 18
  
  Cloud Console Social Login Auth Unavailable
  
  39m
  
  Major
- Mar 1
  
  Cluster unavailability and degraded cluster operations in AWS me-central...
  
  10d 4h 39m
  
  Minor
- Feb 9
  
  Connectivity issues to Standard and Basic clusters on AWS
  
  12h 16m
  
  Major
View all incidents →
Turso

No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

Bottom line

Turso wins

Turso edges out on 90-day uptime.

CockroachDB posted 99.03% vs. 100.00% for Turso (Δ -0.97 pp). Incidents: 3 vs. 0 (+3).

Also compare

Other CockroachDB comparisons

Monitor any service like this.

Pulsetic watches endpoints from 15+ global regions and alerts you before users notice.

Start monitoring free