Service comparison

CockroachDB vs. Turso

CockroachDB vs. Turso: uptime, incident frequency and resolution times, head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 5 incidents total · From each provider's official status page

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window CockroachDB Turso Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
86.80%
100.00%
-13.20 pp
Last 30 days
96.71%
100.00%
-3.29 pp
Last 90 days
97.73%
100.00%
-2.27 pp

Uptime is the share of each window with no incident open on the provider's official status page. Δ is percentage-point difference (CockroachDB minus Turso). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • CockroachDB

    5 total

    4 major 1 minor
    • Median resolution

      4h 8m

    • Longest incident

      22h 11m

  • Turso

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

      —

    • Longest incident

      —

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • CockroachDB logo

    CockroachDB

    • Oct 6

      Stock out issues in GCP us-central1

      22h 11m

      Minor
    • Sep 17

      Connection attempts failing for multiple Basic tenants in GCP South America (southamerica-east1).

      1h 30m

      Major
    • Sep 1

      Cloud Latency, Delays, Connection Issues

      4h 8m

      Major
    • Aug 4

      Cluster connectivity and execution issues

      20h 3m

      Major
    • Jul 12

      Cluster Creation Failure

      1h 16m

      Major
  • Turso logo

    Turso

    No incidents on record.

Bottom line

Turso wins

Turso edges out on 90-day uptime.

CockroachDB posted 97.73% vs. 100.00% for Turso (Δ -2.27 pp). Incidents: 5 vs. 0 (+5).

Where would your uptime rank against Turso?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Aim it at a website you run and build a 90-day record of your own.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.