Service comparison
CockroachDB vs. Turso
CockroachDB vs. Turso: uptime, incident frequency and resolution times, head-to-head.
Last 90 days · 5 incidents total · From each provider's official status page
Service comparison
CockroachDB vs. Turso: uptime, incident frequency and resolution times, head-to-head.
Last 90 days · 5 incidents total · From each provider's official status page
Head-to-head
90-day uptime
97.73%
Incidents (90d)
5
4 major · 1 minor
Median resolution
4h 8m
Longest incident
22h 11m
Turso
turso.tech
90-day uptime
100.00%
Incidents (90d)
0
0 major · 0 minor
Median resolution
—
Longest incident
—
Uptime over time
| Window | CockroachDB | Turso | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 24 hours |
|
|
0.00 pp |
| Last 7 days |
|
|
-13.20 pp |
| Last 30 days |
|
|
-3.29 pp |
| Last 90 days |
|
|
-2.27 pp |
Uptime is the share of each window with no incident open on the provider's official status page. Δ is percentage-point difference (CockroachDB minus Turso). Higher is better.
Incidents 90-day
CockroachDB
5 total
Median resolution
4h 8m
Longest incident
22h 11m
Turso
0 total
Median resolution
—
Longest incident
—
Recent activity
CockroachDB
Stock out issues in GCP us-central1
22h 11m
Connection attempts failing for multiple Basic tenants in GCP South America (southamerica-east1).
1h 30m
Cloud Latency, Delays, Connection Issues
4h 8m
Cluster connectivity and execution issues
20h 3m
Cluster Creation Failure
1h 16m
Turso
No incidents on record.
Bottom line
Turso winsCockroachDB posted 97.73% vs. 100.00% for Turso (Δ -2.27 pp). Incidents: 5 vs. 0 (+5).
Also compare
Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Aim it at a website you run and build a 90-day record of your own.
10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.
Stay online, all the time, with Pulsetic's uptime prime.
By Designmodo
Designmodo Inc. 169 Madison Ave, #79627, New York, NY 10016, United States
Copyright © 2010-2026. Pulsetic® is a registered trademark.