Service comparison
CockroachDB vs. Turso
CockroachDB vs. Turso — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.
Last 90 days · 3 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring
Service comparison
CockroachDB vs. Turso — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.
Last 90 days · 3 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring
Head-to-head
90-day uptime
98.99%
Incidents (90d)
3
2 major · 1 minor
Median resolution
1h 16m
Longest outage
20h 3m
Turso
turso.tech
90-day uptime
100.00%
Incidents (90d)
0
0 major · 0 minor
Median resolution
—
Longest outage
—
Uptime over time
| Window | CockroachDB | Turso | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 24 hours |
|
|
0.00 pp |
| Last 7 days |
|
|
0.00 pp |
| Last 30 days |
|
|
-2.78 pp |
| Last 90 days |
|
|
-1.01 pp |
Δ is percentage-point difference (CockroachDB minus Turso). Higher is better.
Incidents 90-day
CockroachDB
3 total
Median resolution
1h 16m
Longest outage
20h 3m
Turso
0 total
Median resolution
—
Longest outage
—
Recent activity
CockroachDB
Cluster connectivity and execution issues
20h 3m
Cluster Creation Failure
1h 16m
Unable to accept invites
36m
Degraded performance in one AWS us-east-1 availability zone
19h 40m
Cloud Console Social Login Auth Unavailable
39m
Turso
No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.
Bottom line
Turso winsCockroachDB posted 98.99% vs. 100.00% for Turso (Δ -1.01 pp). Incidents: 3 vs. 0 (+3).
Also compare
Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.
10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.
Stay online, all the time, with Pulsetic's uptime prime.
By Designmodo
Designmodo Inc. 169 Madison Ave, #79627, New York, NY 10016, United States
Copyright © 2010-2026. Pulsetic® is a registered trademark.