Service comparison
CockroachDB vs. Turso
CockroachDB vs. Turso — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.
Last 90 days · 4 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring
Service comparison
CockroachDB vs. Turso — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.
Last 90 days · 4 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring
Head-to-head
90-day uptime
98.75%
Incidents (90d)
4
4 major · 0 minor
Median resolution
2h 49m
Longest outage
20h 3m
Turso
turso.tech
90-day uptime
100.00%
Incidents (90d)
0
0 major · 0 minor
Median resolution
—
Longest outage
—
Uptime over time
| Window | CockroachDB | Turso | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 24 hours |
|
|
-2.36 pp |
| Last 7 days |
|
|
-0.89 pp |
| Last 30 days |
|
|
-0.78 pp |
| Last 90 days |
|
|
-1.25 pp |
Δ is percentage-point difference (CockroachDB minus Turso). Higher is better.
Incidents 90-day
CockroachDB
4 total
Median resolution
2h 49m
Longest outage
20h 3m
Turso
0 total
Median resolution
—
Longest outage
—
Recent activity
CockroachDB
Connection attempts failing for multiple Basic tenants in GCP South America (southamerica-east1).
1h 30m
Cloud Latency, Delays, Connection Issues
4h 8m
Cluster connectivity and execution issues
20h 3m
Cluster Creation Failure
1h 16m
Unable to accept invites
36m
Turso
No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.
Bottom line
Turso winsCockroachDB posted 98.75% vs. 100.00% for Turso (Δ -1.25 pp). Incidents: 4 vs. 0 (+4).
Also compare
Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.
10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.
Stay online, all the time, with Pulsetic's uptime prime.
By Designmodo
Designmodo Inc. 169 Madison Ave, #79627, New York, NY 10016, United States
Copyright © 2010-2026. Pulsetic® is a registered trademark.