Service comparison

CockroachDB vs. Turso

CockroachDB vs. Turso — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 4 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window CockroachDB Turso Δ
Last 24 hours
97.64%
100.00%
-2.36 pp
Last 7 days
99.11%
100.00%
-0.89 pp
Last 30 days
99.22%
100.00%
-0.78 pp
Last 90 days
98.75%
100.00%
-1.25 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (CockroachDB minus Turso). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • CockroachDB

    4 total

    4 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

      2h 49m

    • Longest outage

      20h 3m

  • Turso

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • CockroachDB logo

    CockroachDB

    • Sep 17

      Connection attempts failing for multiple Basic tenants in GCP South America (southamerica-east1).

      1h 30m

      Major
    • Sep 1

      Cloud Latency, Delays, Connection Issues

      4h 8m

      Major
    • Aug 4

      Cluster connectivity and execution issues

      20h 3m

      Major
    • Jul 12

      Cluster Creation Failure

      1h 16m

      Major
    • Jun 9

      Unable to accept invites

      36m

      Minor
  • Turso logo

    Turso

    No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

Bottom line

Turso wins

Turso edges out on 90-day uptime.

CockroachDB posted 98.75% vs. 100.00% for Turso (Δ -1.25 pp). Incidents: 4 vs. 0 (+4).

Where would your uptime rank against Turso?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.