Service comparison

Fly.io vs. Railway

Fly.io vs. Railway — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 69 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Fly.io Railway Δ
Last 24 hours
47.99%
100.00%
-52.01 pp
Last 7 days
86.34%
100.00%
-13.66 pp
Last 30 days
94.48%
100.00%
-5.52 pp
Last 90 days
87.89%
100.00%
-12.11 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Fly.io minus Railway). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Fly.io

    69 total

    30 major 39 minor
    • Median resolution

      1h 38m

    • Longest outage

      46h 6m

  • Railway

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Fly.io logo

    Fly.io

    • Aug 4

      MPG creation is failing in GRU due to lack of capacity

      8h 19m

      Major
    • Aug 4

      Certificate issuance delays

      9h 4m

      Minor
    • Aug 3

      Inbound connection failure to Fly Apps

      3h 33m

      Major
    • Aug 1

      Managed Postgres v2 control plane issues in iad

      1h 28m

      Minor
    • Jul 31

      Capacity issues in CDG

      3h 27m

      Minor
  • Railway logo

    Railway

    No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

Bottom line

Railway wins

Railway edges out on 90-day uptime.

Fly.io posted 87.89% vs. 100.00% for Railway (Δ -12.11 pp). Incidents: 69 vs. 0 (+69).

Monitor any service like this.

Pulsetic watches endpoints from 15+ global regions and alerts you before users notice.