Service comparison

GitHub vs. WorkOS

GitHub vs. WorkOS — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 83 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window GitHub WorkOS Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
93.26%
99.31%
-6.05 pp
Last 30 days
95.60%
91.57%
+4.03 pp
Last 90 days
89.75%
96.65%
-6.90 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (GitHub minus WorkOS). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • GitHub

    66 total

    24 major 42 minor
    • Median resolution

      1h 49m

    • Longest outage

      61h 57m

  • WorkOS

    17 total

    7 major 10 minor
    • Median resolution

      41m

    • Longest outage

      55h 35m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • GitHub logo

    GitHub

    • Jul 9

      Delays starting Actions runs

      9h 17m

      Major
    • Jul 7

      Actions and Codespaces APIs experiencing partial failures

      2h 2m

      Major
    • Jul 2

      Incident with Pages

      1h 31m

      Minor
    • Jul 1

      Delays in copilot budget limits resets for some users

      2h 34m

      Minor
    • Jun 30

      Disruption with some GitHub services - Signup Flow

      10m

      Minor
  • WorkOS logo

    WorkOS

    • Jul 10

      Elevated error rates for standalone MFA requests

      1h 10m

      Minor
    • Jun 22

      Degraded performance for Directory Provisioning for Authkit

      2d 7h 35m

      Major
    • Jun 22

      Elevated API Errors

      3h 57m

      Minor
    • Jun 9

      SSO Request Latency

      < 1m

      Minor
    • Jun 4

      Email delivery delays

      1h 26m

      Major

Bottom line

WorkOS wins

WorkOS edges out on 90-day uptime.

GitHub posted 89.75% vs. 96.65% for WorkOS (Δ -6.90 pp). Incidents: 66 vs. 17 (+49).

Monitor any service like this.

Pulsetic watches endpoints from 15+ global regions and alerts you before users notice.