Service comparison

Linode vs. Vultr

Linode vs. Vultr — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 26 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Linode Vultr Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 30 days
90.80%
100.00%
-9.20 pp
Last 90 days
66.43%
100.00%
-33.57 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Linode minus Vultr). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Linode

    26 total

    0 major 26 minor
    • Median resolution

      3h 5m

    • Longest outage

      282h 51m

  • Vultr

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Linode logo

    Linode

    • Sep 7

      Service Issue - Cloud Manager and API

      2h 52m

      Minor
    • Aug 28

      Service Issue - US-SEA (Seattle, WA)

      7h 18m

      Minor
    • Aug 24

      Service Issue - Object Storage - US-SEA

      3h 18m

      Minor
    • Aug 21

      Service Issue - US-SEA (Seattle, WA)

      4h 35m

      Minor
    • Aug 14

      Connectivity Issue - IT-MIL (Milan) data center

      1h 17m

      Minor
  • Vultr logo

    Vultr

    No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

Bottom line

Vultr wins

Vultr edges out on 90-day uptime.

Linode posted 66.43% vs. 100.00% for Vultr (Δ -33.57 pp). Incidents: 26 vs. 0 (+26).

Where would your uptime rank against Vultr?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.