Service comparison

Linode vs. Vultr

Linode vs. Vultr: uptime, incident frequency and resolution times, head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 21 incidents total · From each provider's official status page

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Linode Vultr Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
97.47%
100.00%
-2.53 pp
Last 30 days
94.44%
100.00%
-5.56 pp
Last 90 days
78.89%
100.00%
-21.11 pp

Uptime is the share of each window with no incident open on the provider's official status page. Δ is percentage-point difference (Linode minus Vultr). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Linode

    21 total

    0 major 21 minor
    • Median resolution

      3h 18m

    • Longest incident

      265h 25m

  • Vultr

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

      —

    • Longest incident

      —

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Linode logo

    Linode

    • Oct 2

      Service Issue - Object Storage - US-Southeast (Atlanta)

      4h 15m

      Minor
    • Sep 25

      Service Issue - Cloud Manager and API

      1h 12m

      Minor
    • Sep 21

      Emerging Service Issue - Cloud Manager and API

      1d 10h 12m

      Minor
    • Sep 21

      Emerging Service Issue - [DNS] - [eu-west]

      7h 14m

      Minor
    • Sep 7

      Service Issue - Cloud Manager and API

      2h 52m

      Minor
  • Vultr logo

    Vultr

    No incidents on record.

Bottom line

Vultr wins

Vultr edges out on 90-day uptime.

Linode posted 78.89% vs. 100.00% for Vultr (Δ -21.11 pp). Incidents: 21 vs. 0 (+21).

Where would your uptime rank against Vultr?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Aim it at a website you run and build a 90-day record of your own.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.