Service comparison

Linode vs. Vultr

Linode vs. Vultr: uptime, incident frequency and resolution times, head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 26 incidents total · From each provider's official status page

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Linode Vultr Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
71.42%
100.00%
-28.58 pp
Last 30 days
73.27%
100.00%
-26.73 pp
Last 90 days
71.56%
100.00%
-28.44 pp

Uptime is the share of each window with no incident open on the provider's official status page. Δ is percentage-point difference (Linode minus Vultr). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Linode

    26 total

    0 major 26 minor
    • Median resolution

      5h 41m

    • Longest incident

      265h 25m

  • Vultr

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

      —

    • Longest incident

      —

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Linode logo

    Linode

    • Oct 28

      Service Issue - Block Storage (BR-GRU)

      Ongoing

      Minor
    • Oct 25

      Connectivity Issue between ID-CGK (Jakarta) and SG-SIN-2 (Singapore 2)

      Ongoing

      Minor
    • Oct 23

      Connectivity Issue - Dallas Data Center (IPv6 Traffic to Google)

      11h 17m

      Minor
    • Oct 22

      Customer Security Advisory: Critical F5/NGINX Out-of-Band Vulnerabilities

      Ongoing

      Minor
    • Oct 22

      Service Issue - Linode Kubernetes Engine

      < 1m

      Minor
  • Vultr logo

    Vultr

    No incidents on record.

Bottom line

Vultr wins

Vultr edges out on 90-day uptime.

Linode posted 71.56% vs. 100.00% for Vultr (Δ -28.44 pp). Incidents: 26 vs. 0 (+26).

Where would your uptime rank against Vultr?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Aim it at a website you run and build a 90-day record of your own.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.