GitHub Status · History · Incident #143550
RESOLVEDActions Job Delays
Minor · Started Oct 1, 2026 · 2:47 PM
GitHub Status · History · Incident #143550
RESOLVEDMinor · Started Oct 1, 2026 · 2:47 PM
Duration
3h 9m
Severity
Minor
Detection lead
—
User reports
—
Summary
On October 1, 2026, GitHub Actions experienced two periods of delayed and failed job starts on GitHub-hosted runners, beginning at approximately 14:15 UTC. Across the 14:15–17:56 UTC incident-response window, approximately 0.68% of workflow runs experienced start delays, and 0.196% of jobs failed to start. <br /><br />A routing change at our cloud provider concentrated API traffic on a single backend, causing an increase in rate-limit errors. Incorrect retry behavior in the provider’s inventory service added load to the affected APIs, compounding the rate limiting. This disrupted runner provisioning and reduced available capacity in affected regions. The resulting increase in demand in unaffected regions exposed a concurrency limit in our job-assignment system, delaying jobs even where runners were available. <br /><br />During the response, we increased job-assignment concurrency, scaled runner capacity, and worked with our cloud provider to reduce API load by excluding our runner subscriptions from its inventory service. By approximately 16:15 UTC, jobs were starting and executing as expected. We continued mitigation and monitoring until the incident was resolved at 17:56 UTC. <br /><br />Our cloud provider has since increased resource-management API rate limits for our workloads. To reduce the likelihood and impact of similar incidents, we are also adding more granular rate-limiting alerts and updating our job-assignment system to handle increased demand across fewer available regions.
Started
Oct 1, 2026 · 2:47 PM
Resolved
Oct 1, 2026 · 5:56 PM
Duration
3h 9m
Severity
Minor
Event timeline
Investigating
Oct 1 · 2:47 PM GitHubWe are investigating reports of degraded performance for Actions
Investigating
Oct 1 · 2:54 PM GitHubWe have identified the cause of increased Actions run start delays on Ubuntu runners and are actively deploying a fix. Customers may continue to experience intermittent delays while the mitigation rolls out and service metrics return to normal.
Investigating
Oct 1 · 3:02 PM GitHubRun-start delays on Ubuntu runners have been resolved. We are investigating run-start delays on Windows runners and will share more information as it becomes available.
Monitoring
Oct 1 · 3:10 PM GitHubThe degradation affecting Actions has been mitigated. We are monitoring to ensure stability.
Investigating
Oct 1 · 3:20 PM GitHubActions is experiencing degraded performance. We are continuing to investigate.
Investigating
Oct 1 · 3:29 PM GitHubWe are seeing a reoccurrence in run-start delays, and are continuing to investigate to issue. Customers will potentially experience delays of up to ten minutes.
Investigating
Oct 1 · 4:10 PM GitHubWe have identified an issue with our upstream provider which is causing Actions requests to 429 which is creating the delays. We have escalated to the owning team and are investigating how to mitigate the 429s.
Investigating
Oct 1 · 4:48 PM GitHubWe are currently applying a mitigation and anticipate recovery within thirty minutes.
Investigating
Oct 1 · 5:50 PM GitHubGitHub Actions experienced degraded performance for some hosted runners due to throttling within an upstream Azure dependency. Service capacity has recovered, and we are continuing to monitor while working with Azure on the underlying condition.
Resolved
Oct 1 · 5:56 PM GitHubOn October 1, 2026, GitHub Actions experienced two periods of delayed and failed job starts on GitHub-hosted runners, beginning at approximately 14:15 UTC. Across the 14:15–17:56 UTC incident-response window, approximately 0.68% of workflow runs experienced start delays, and 0.196% of jobs failed to start. <br /><br />A routing change at our cloud provider concentrated API traffic on a single backend, causing an increase in rate-limit errors. Incorrect retry behavior in the provider’s inventory service added load to the affected APIs, compounding the rate limiting. This disrupted runner provisioning and reduced available capacity in affected regions. The resulting increase in demand in unaffected regions exposed a concurrency limit in our job-assignment system, delaying jobs even where runners were available. <br /><br />During the response, we increased job-assignment concurrency, scaled runner capacity, and worked with our cloud provider to reduce API load by excluding our runner subscriptions from its inventory service. By approximately 16:15 UTC, jobs were starting and executing as expected. We continued mitigation and monitoring until the incident was resolved at 17:56 UTC. <br /><br />Our cloud provider has since increased resource-management API rate limits for our workloads. To reduce the likelihood and impact of similar incidents, we are also adding more granular rate-limiting alerts and updating our job-assignment system to handle increased demand across fewer available regions.
Add it as a dependency monitor. The Free plan includes one.
Stay online, all the time, with Pulsetic's uptime prime.
By Designmodo
Designmodo Inc. 169 Madison Ave, #79627, New York, NY 10016, United States
Copyright © 2010-2026. Pulsetic® is a registered trademark.