Service comparison

2600hz vs. Better Impact

2600hz vs. Better Impact — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 3 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window 2600hz Better Impact Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 90 days
99.81%
100.00%
-0.19 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (2600hz minus Better Impact). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • 2600hz

    3 total

    0 major 3 minor
    • Median resolution

      1h 27m

    • Longest outage

      2h 11m

  • Better Impact

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • 2600hz logo

    2600hz

    • Aug 17

      Provisioning issue - Yealink Phones

      2h 11m

      Minor
    • Jul 15

      API Issues on Hosted

      25m

      Minor
    • Jul 12

      Connectivity Alerts 07/12/26

      1h 27m

      Minor
    • Feb 20

      Investigating reports of outages

      1h 24m

      Minor
    • Jan 27

      Degraded performance in ORD zone due to Cloudflare issues

      20h 57m

      Minor
  • Better Impact logo

    Better Impact

    • Jan 27

      Web access issues

      1d 2h 9m

      Minor
    • Apr 4

      Email Deliverability Issue

      67d 5h

      Major
    • Jun 8

      Issues with our content delivery network provider

      1h 29m

      Minor

Bottom line

Better Impact wins

Better Impact edges out on 90-day uptime.

2600hz posted 99.81% vs. 100.00% for Better Impact (Δ -0.19 pp). Incidents: 3 vs. 0 (+3).

Where would your uptime rank against Better Impact?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.