Service comparison

Accelerant vs. Anam

Accelerant vs. Anam — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 2 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Accelerant Anam Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
99.93%
+0.07 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
99.98%
+0.02 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Accelerant minus Anam). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Accelerant

    1 total

    1 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

      59m

    • Longest outage

      59m

  • Anam

    1 total

    1 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

      31m

    • Longest outage

      31m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Accelerant logo

    Accelerant

    • Jul 13

      Platform screens partially loading

      59m

      Major
    • May 13

      Errors on analytics dashboards

      1h 14m

      Major
  • Anam logo

    Anam

    • Aug 28

      Session start failures in the US region

      31m

      Major
    • Jun 12

      LiveKit session start issues

      45m

      Major
    • Jun 9

      Avatar sessions unavailable

      1h 58m

      Major
    • Jun 4

      Issues with sessions starting

      37m

      Major
    • May 21

      RAG service is down for US traffic

      1h 18m

      Minor

Bottom line

It's a tie

Accelerant and Anam are evenly matched on uptime.

Accelerant posted 100.00% vs. 99.98% for Anam (Δ +0.02 pp). Incidents: 1 vs. 1 (0).

Where would your own uptime land?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.