Service comparison

Accelerant vs. Anam

Accelerant vs. Anam: uptime, incident frequency and resolution times, head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 5 incidents total · From each provider's official status page

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Accelerant Anam Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 30 days
99.99%
99.97%
+0.02 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
99.97%
+0.03 pp

Uptime is the share of each window with no incident open on the provider's official status page. Δ is percentage-point difference (Accelerant minus Anam). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Accelerant

    2 total

    2 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

      33m

    • Longest incident

      59m

  • Anam

    3 total

    3 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

      31m

    • Longest incident

      50m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Accelerant logo

    Accelerant

    • Sep 18

      TEST_ #inc-2026-09-18-dr-exercise-rx-analytics-outage

      6m

      Major
    • Jul 13

      Platform screens partially loading

      59m

      Major
    • May 13

      Errors on analytics dashboards

      1h 14m

      Major
  • Anam logo

    Anam

    • Sep 23

      WebRTC sessions are failing to start

      13m

      Major
    • Sep 23

      Session failures in the US region

      50m

      Major
    • Aug 28

      Session start failures in the US region

      31m

      Major
    • Jun 12

      LiveKit session start issues

      45m

      Major
    • Jun 9

      Avatar sessions unavailable

      1h 58m

      Major

Bottom line

It's a tie

Accelerant and Anam are evenly matched on uptime.

Accelerant posted 100.00% vs. 99.97% for Anam (Δ +0.03 pp). Incidents: 2 vs. 3 (-1).

Where would your own uptime land?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Aim it at a website you run and build a 90-day record of your own.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.