Service comparison

Accelerant vs. ArborXR

Accelerant vs. ArborXR — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 1 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Accelerant ArborXR Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Accelerant minus ArborXR). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Accelerant

    1 total

    1 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

      59m

    • Longest outage

      59m

  • ArborXR

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Accelerant logo

    Accelerant

    • Jul 13

      Platform screens partially loading

      59m

      Major
    • May 13

      Errors on analytics dashboards

      1h 14m

      Major
  • ArborXR logo

    ArborXR

    • Apr 22

      Portal Partially Unavailable

      1h 3m

      Major
    • Feb 2

      Portal is unavailable. We are currently investigating

      1h 7m

      Major
    • Jan 19

      Management Portal Unavailable

      27m

      Major
    • Nov 24

      Degradation of Services

      1h 51m

      Minor
    • Oct 29

      Management Portal Unavailable During Upgrade

      46m

      Major

Bottom line

It's a tie

Accelerant and ArborXR are evenly matched on uptime.

Accelerant posted 100.00% vs. 100.00% for ArborXR (Δ 0.00 pp). Incidents: 1 vs. 0 (+1).

Where would your own uptime land?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.