Service comparison

Accelerant vs. AssemblyAI

Accelerant vs. AssemblyAI — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 14 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Accelerant AssemblyAI Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
99.27%
+0.73 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
99.70%
+0.30 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
99.63%
+0.37 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Accelerant minus AssemblyAI). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Accelerant

    1 total

    1 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

      59m

    • Longest outage

      59m

  • AssemblyAI

    13 total

    4 major 9 minor
    • Median resolution

      20m

    • Longest outage

      1h 47m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Accelerant logo

    Accelerant

    • Jul 13

      Platform screens partially loading

      59m

      Major
    • May 13

      Errors on analytics dashboards

      1h 14m

      Major
  • AssemblyAI logo

    AssemblyAI

    • Sep 16

      Outage on US Async Endpoint

      1h 14m

      Major
    • Sep 13

      Elevated turnaround times for async transcription

      < 1m

      Minor
    • Aug 25

      Increased latency for Universal 3.5 Pro Realtime model

      6m

      Minor
    • Aug 20

      Async Transcription Service Issues

      49m

      Minor
    • Aug 19

      EU endpoint session failures on Universal 3.5 Pro Realtime

      7m

      Major

Bottom line

Accelerant wins

Accelerant edges out on 90-day uptime.

Accelerant posted 100.00% vs. 99.63% for AssemblyAI (Δ +0.37 pp). Incidents: 1 vs. 13 (-12).

Where would your uptime rank against Accelerant?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.