Service comparison
Accelerant vs. AssemblyAI
Accelerant vs. AssemblyAI — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.
Last 90 days · 14 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring
Service comparison
Accelerant vs. AssemblyAI — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.
Last 90 days · 14 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring
Head-to-head
Accelerant
accelerant.ai
90-day uptime
100.00%
Incidents (90d)
1
1 major · 0 minor
Median resolution
59m
Longest outage
59m
AssemblyAI
assemblyai.com
90-day uptime
99.63%
Incidents (90d)
13
4 major · 9 minor
Median resolution
20m
Longest outage
1h 47m
Uptime over time
| Window | Accelerant | AssemblyAI | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 24 hours |
|
|
0.00 pp |
| Last 7 days |
|
|
+0.73 pp |
| Last 30 days |
|
|
+0.30 pp |
| Last 90 days |
|
|
+0.37 pp |
Δ is percentage-point difference (Accelerant minus AssemblyAI). Higher is better.
Incidents 90-day
Accelerant
1 total
Median resolution
59m
Longest outage
59m
AssemblyAI
13 total
Median resolution
20m
Longest outage
1h 47m
Recent activity
Accelerant
Platform screens partially loading
59m
Errors on analytics dashboards
1h 14m
AssemblyAI
Outage on US Async Endpoint
1h 14m
Elevated turnaround times for async transcription
< 1m
Increased latency for Universal 3.5 Pro Realtime model
6m
Async Transcription Service Issues
49m
EU endpoint session failures on Universal 3.5 Pro Realtime
7m
Bottom line
Accelerant winsAccelerant posted 100.00% vs. 99.63% for AssemblyAI (Δ +0.37 pp). Incidents: 1 vs. 13 (-12).
Also compare
Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.
10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.
Stay online, all the time, with Pulsetic's uptime prime.
By Designmodo
Designmodo Inc. 169 Madison Ave, #79627, New York, NY 10016, United States
Copyright © 2010-2026. Pulsetic® is a registered trademark.