Service comparison

Accelerant vs. Atomic.io

Accelerant vs. Atomic.io: uptime, incident frequency and resolution times, head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 2 incidents total · From each provider's official status page

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Accelerant Atomic.io Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
97.13%
100.00%
-2.87 pp
Last 30 days
99.33%
100.00%
-0.67 pp
Last 90 days
99.77%
100.00%
-0.23 pp

Uptime is the share of each window with no incident open on the provider's official status page. Δ is percentage-point difference (Accelerant minus Atomic.io). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Accelerant

    2 total

    1 major 1 minor
    • Median resolution

      2h 27m

    • Longest incident

      4h 49m

  • Atomic.io

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

      —

    • Longest incident

      —

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Accelerant logo

    Accelerant

    • Oct 21

      Service errors affecting Snowflake-dependent features

      4h 49m

      Major
    • Sep 18

      TEST_ #inc-2026-09-18-dr-exercise-rx-analytics-outage

      6m

      Minor
    • Jul 13

      Platform screens partially loading

      59m

      Major
    • May 13

      Errors on analytics dashboards

      1h 14m

      Major
  • Atomic.io logo

    Atomic.io

    • Jun 14, 2023

      AWS degradation

      2h 16m

      Minor
    • Dec 2, 2020

      Workbench Connectivity

      44m

      Minor
    • Nov 26, 2020

      AWS outage causing intermittent errors

      23h 27m

      Minor

Bottom line

Atomic.io wins

Atomic.io edges out on 90-day uptime.

Accelerant posted 99.77% vs. 100.00% for Atomic.io (Δ -0.23 pp). Incidents: 2 vs. 0 (+2).

Where would your uptime rank against Atomic.io?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Aim it at a website you run and build a 90-day record of your own.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.