Service comparison

Accelerant vs. Replicate

Accelerant vs. Replicate — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 2 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Accelerant

accelerant.ai

Online
- 90-day uptime
  
  100.00%
- Incidents (90d)
  
  2
  
  2 major · 0 minor
- Median resolution
  
  33m
- Longest outage
  
  59m
View status page →
Replicate

replicate.com

Online
- 90-day uptime
  
  100.00%
- Incidents (90d)
  
  0
  
  0 major · 0 minor
- Median resolution
  
  —
- Longest outage
  
  —
View status page →

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window	Accelerant	Replicate	Δ
Last 24 hours	99.58%	100.00%	-0.42 pp
Last 7 days	99.94%	100.00%	-0.06 pp
Last 30 days	99.99%	100.00%	-0.01 pp
Last 90 days	100.00%	100.00%	0.00 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Accelerant minus Replicate). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

Accelerant

2 total

2 major 0 minor
- Median resolution
  
  33m
- Longest outage
  
  59m
Replicate

0 total

0 major 0 minor
- Median resolution
  
  —
- Longest outage
  
  —

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

Accelerant
- Sep 18
  
  TEST_ #inc-2026-09-18-dr-exercise-rx-analytics-outage
  
  6m
  
  Major
- Jul 13
  
  Platform screens partially loading
  
  59m
  
  Major
- May 13
  
  Errors on analytics dashboards
  
  1h 14m
  
  Major
View all incidents →
Replicate

No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

Bottom line

It's a tie

Accelerant and Replicate are evenly matched on uptime.

Accelerant posted 100.00% vs. 100.00% for Replicate (Δ 0.00 pp). Incidents: 2 vs. 0 (+2).

Also compare

Other Accelerant comparisons

Where would your own uptime land?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.

Measure Yours