Service comparison

Acquia vs. Adaptive Web Services

Acquia vs. Adaptive Web Services — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 19 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Acquia Adaptive Web Services Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 30 days
92.45%
100.00%
-7.55 pp
Last 90 days
93.98%
100.00%
-6.02 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Acquia minus Adaptive Web Services). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Acquia

    19 total

    9 major 10 minor
    • Median resolution

      2h 46m

    • Longest outage

      48h 48m

  • Adaptive Web Services

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Acquia logo

    Acquia

    • Sep 7

      Intermittent Pipeline Job Start Failures

      4h 1m

      Minor
    • Sep 3

      Error rates for Acquia Task System

      2h 58m

      Major
    • Sep 3

      Multiple customers are currently affected by what appears to be an outage impacting the Site Studio endpoint

      10h 35m

      Major
    • Sep 3

      Degraded Performance - SearchStax Pulse Performance Graphs

      9h 37m

      Minor
    • Sep 3

      Acquia DAM Service Outage

      1h 19m

      Major
  • Adaptive Web Services logo

    Adaptive Web Services

    • Dec 21

      Test incident - as Google would say, works ok for us...

      6h 42m

      Major

Bottom line

Adaptive Web Services wins

Adaptive Web Services edges out on 90-day uptime.

Acquia posted 93.98% vs. 100.00% for Adaptive Web Services (Δ -6.02 pp). Incidents: 19 vs. 0 (+19).

Where would your own uptime land?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.