Service comparison

Action Marketing vs. Extole

Action Marketing vs. Extole — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 2 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Action Marketing Extole Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
99.90%
+0.10 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
99.98%
+0.02 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
99.81%
+0.19 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Action Marketing minus Extole). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Action Marketing

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

  • Extole

    2 total

    1 major 1 minor
    • Median resolution

      2h 3m

    • Longest outage

      3h 57m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Action Marketing logo

    Action Marketing

    No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

  • Extole logo

    Extole

    • Sep 14

      Consumer API Performance

      10m

      Major
    • Jun 26

      CSS Not Rendering

      3h 57m

      Minor
    • May 21

      GitHub Security Incident Response

      < 1m

      Minor
    • May 5

      Email Delays

      3h 58m

      Minor
    • Apr 30

      Consumer Database Failover

      < 1m

      Minor

Bottom line

Action Marketing wins

Action Marketing edges out on 90-day uptime.

Action Marketing posted 100.00% vs. 99.81% for Extole (Δ +0.19 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 2 (-2).

Where would your uptime rank against Action Marketing?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.