Service comparison
ActiveCampaign vs. BL.INK
ActiveCampaign vs. BL.INK — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.
Last 90 days · 10 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring
Service comparison
ActiveCampaign vs. BL.INK — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.
Last 90 days · 10 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring
Head-to-head
90-day uptime
92.45%
Incidents (90d)
10
6 major · 4 minor
Median resolution
1h 17m
Longest outage
129h 4m
BL.INK
bl.ink
90-day uptime
100.00%
Incidents (90d)
0
0 major · 0 minor
Median resolution
—
Longest outage
—
Uptime over time
| Window | ActiveCampaign | BL.INK | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 24 hours |
|
|
0.00 pp |
| Last 7 days |
|
|
-0.26 pp |
| Last 30 days |
|
|
-0.12 pp |
| Last 90 days |
|
|
-7.55 pp |
Δ is percentage-point difference (ActiveCampaign minus BL.INK). Higher is better.
Incidents 90-day
ActiveCampaign
10 total
Median resolution
1h 17m
Longest outage
129h 4m
BL.INK
0 total
Median resolution
—
Longest outage
—
Recent activity
ActiveCampaign
Bulk Edit of contacts is not applying filters.
26m
Issues Accessing Accounts
28m
Issue impacting customer logins for a portion of users
2h 44m
Issue Affecting Segmented Campaigns in the EU Region
1d 41m
Engineers are researching an issue that may caused some customer reports to intermittently not load.
1h 50m
BL.INK
No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.
Bottom line
BL.INK winsActiveCampaign posted 92.45% vs. 100.00% for BL.INK (Δ -7.55 pp). Incidents: 10 vs. 0 (+10).
Also compare
Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.
10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.
Stay online, all the time, with Pulsetic's uptime prime.
By Designmodo
Designmodo Inc. 169 Madison Ave, #79627, New York, NY 10016, United States
Copyright © 2010-2026. Pulsetic® is a registered trademark.