Service comparison

AWeber vs. Loops

AWeber vs. Loops — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 2 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window AWeber Loops Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 30 days
99.92%
99.78%
+0.14 pp
Last 90 days
99.97%
99.93%
+0.04 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (AWeber minus Loops). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • AWeber

    1 total

    0 major 1 minor
    • Median resolution

      35m

    • Longest outage

      35m

  • Loops

    1 total

    0 major 1 minor
    • Median resolution

      1h 33m

    • Longest outage

      1h 33m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • AWeber logo

    AWeber

    • Aug 28

      Signup forms outage

      35m

      Minor
    • Oct 20

      Unscheduled interruption

      28m

      Minor
    • Aug 7

      Unscheduled interruption

      20m

      Major
    • Jul 28

      Unscheduled interruption

      21m

      Minor
    • Jun 2

      Unscheduled interruption

      2h 30m

      Minor
  • Loops logo

    Loops

    • Sep 11

      Delay in email metric processing

      1h 33m

      Minor
    • Mar 2

      increased rate of 500 level responses

      45m

      Major
    • Feb 10

      Webhook Delivery Delayed

      7h 31m

      Minor
    • Jan 24

      Elevated error rates for app.loops.so

      1h 17m

      Minor
    • Nov 18

      Elevated error rates for app.loops.so

      3h 24m

      Minor

Bottom line

It's a tie

AWeber and Loops are evenly matched on uptime.

AWeber posted 99.97% vs. 99.93% for Loops (Δ +0.04 pp). Incidents: 1 vs. 1 (0).

Where would your own uptime land?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.