Service comparison

Balsamiq vs. IconFalcon

Balsamiq vs. IconFalcon — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 0 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Balsamiq IconFalcon Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Balsamiq minus IconFalcon). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Balsamiq

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

  • IconFalcon

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Balsamiq logo

    Balsamiq

    • Aug 22

      Service Disruption

      1h 9m

      Major
    • Apr 4

      Service down

      4h 8m

      Major
  • IconFalcon logo

    IconFalcon

    • Apr 29

      Admin dashboard inaccessible

      < 1m

      Major
    • Apr 29

      Icons are not loading

      1m

      Minor
    • Jan 7

      Investigating an outage with icon generation

      7m

      Minor

Bottom line

It's a tie

Balsamiq and IconFalcon are evenly matched on uptime.

Balsamiq posted 100.00% vs. 100.00% for IconFalcon (Δ 0.00 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 0 (0).

Where would your own uptime land?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.