Service comparison

Balsamiq vs. Marvel

Balsamiq vs. Marvel — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 0 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Balsamiq Marvel Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Balsamiq minus Marvel). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Balsamiq

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

  • Marvel

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Balsamiq logo

    Balsamiq

    • Aug 22

      Service Disruption

      1h 9m

      Major
    • Apr 4

      Service down

      4h 8m

      Major
  • Marvel logo

    Marvel

    • Aug 7

      Design Tool storage intermittent failures

      4d 22h 20m

      Major
    • Feb 20

      Outage of backend system supporting Marvel

      3h 19m

      Major
    • Jun 6

      Infrastructure Outage

      24m

      Major
    • Feb 19

      DNS Failure

      37m

      Minor
    • Dec 14

      Parts of the service are not responding

      5m

      Minor

Bottom line

It's a tie

Balsamiq and Marvel are evenly matched on uptime.

Balsamiq posted 100.00% vs. 100.00% for Marvel (Δ 0.00 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 0 (0).

Where would your own uptime land?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.