Service comparison

Contabo vs. Hostinger

Contabo vs. Hostinger — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 131 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Contabo Hostinger Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
94.24%
+5.76 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
94.90%
+5.10 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
78.56%
+21.44 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
51.23%
+48.77 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Contabo minus Hostinger). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Contabo

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

  • Hostinger

    131 total

    8 major 123 minor
    • Median resolution

      53m

    • Longest outage

      864h 45m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Contabo logo

    Contabo

    No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

  • Hostinger logo

    Hostinger

    • Sep 18

      Emergency Server DE-1973 Maintenance

      20m

      Minor
    • Sep 18

      Emergency Server id-dci-h5g-node35 Maintenance

      4m

      Minor
    • Sep 18

      Emergency Server US-899 Maintenance

      59m

      Minor
    • Sep 17

      Emergency Server IN-1495 Maintenance

      16m

      Minor
    • Sep 17

      hPanel Accessibility Issues

      32m

      Minor

Bottom line

Contabo wins

Contabo edges out on 90-day uptime.

Contabo posted 100.00% vs. 51.23% for Hostinger (Δ +48.77 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 131 (-131).

Where would your uptime rank against Contabo?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.