Service comparison

Contabo vs. Hostinger

Contabo vs. Hostinger — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 125 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Contabo Hostinger Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
98.40%
+1.60 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
75.79%
+24.21 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
83.74%
+16.26 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
51.27%
+48.73 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Contabo minus Hostinger). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Contabo

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

  • Hostinger

    125 total

    8 major 117 minor
    • Median resolution

      49m

    • Longest outage

      864h 45m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Contabo logo

    Contabo

    No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

  • Hostinger logo

    Hostinger

    • Aug 29

      Emergency Server IN-906 Maintenance

      Ongoing

      Minor
    • Aug 29

      Emergency Server UK-h5g-node17 Maintenance

      17m

      Minor
    • Aug 28

      Emergency Server DE-1698 Maintenance

      6m

      Minor
    • Aug 27

      Degraded Server IN-837 Performance

      19m

      Minor
    • Aug 27

      Emergency Server web2210 Maintenance

      41m

      Minor

Bottom line

Contabo wins

Contabo edges out on 90-day uptime.

Contabo posted 100.00% vs. 51.27% for Hostinger (Δ +48.73 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 125 (-125).

Where would your uptime rank against Contabo?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.