Service comparison

Contabo vs. Liquid Web

Contabo vs. Liquid Web — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 15 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Contabo Liquid Web Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
86.84%
+13.16 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
56.88%
+43.12 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Contabo minus Liquid Web). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Contabo

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

  • Liquid Web

    15 total

    7 major 8 minor
    • Median resolution

      28h 22m

    • Longest outage

      484h 53m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Contabo logo

    Contabo

    No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

  • Liquid Web logo

    Liquid Web

    • Aug 17

      GitHub Peformance Impact

      1d 4h 41m

      Minor
    • Aug 13

      Service disruption at the Phoenix Data Center

      2d 17h 30m

      Major
    • Aug 12

      Security Advisory: WordPress Security Update for CVE-2026-65640

      Ongoing

      Minor
    • Aug 8

      Security Advisory: WordPress XSS2Shell Vulnerability (CVE-2026-64638)

      Ongoing

      Minor
    • Jul 31

      VMware MT Service Degradation

      33m

      Major

Bottom line

Contabo wins

Contabo edges out on 90-day uptime.

Contabo posted 100.00% vs. 56.88% for Liquid Web (Δ +43.12 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 15 (-15).

Where would your uptime rank against Contabo?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.