Service comparison
Contabo vs. Liquid Web
Contabo vs. Liquid Web — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.
Last 90 days · 15 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring
Service comparison
Contabo vs. Liquid Web — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.
Last 90 days · 15 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring
Head-to-head
Contabo
contabo.com
90-day uptime
100.00%
Incidents (90d)
0
0 major · 0 minor
Median resolution
—
Longest outage
—
Liquid Web
liquidweb.com
90-day uptime
56.88%
Incidents (90d)
15
7 major · 8 minor
Median resolution
28h 22m
Longest outage
484h 53m
Uptime over time
| Window | Contabo | Liquid Web | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 24 hours |
|
|
0.00 pp |
| Last 7 days |
|
|
0.00 pp |
| Last 30 days |
|
|
+13.16 pp |
| Last 90 days |
|
|
+43.12 pp |
Δ is percentage-point difference (Contabo minus Liquid Web). Higher is better.
Incidents 90-day
Contabo
0 total
Median resolution
—
Longest outage
—
Liquid Web
15 total
Median resolution
28h 22m
Longest outage
484h 53m
Recent activity
Contabo
No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.
Liquid Web
GitHub Peformance Impact
1d 4h 41m
Service disruption at the Phoenix Data Center
2d 17h 30m
Security Advisory: WordPress Security Update for CVE-2026-65640
Ongoing
Security Advisory: WordPress XSS2Shell Vulnerability (CVE-2026-64638)
Ongoing
VMware MT Service Degradation
33m
Bottom line
Contabo winsContabo posted 100.00% vs. 56.88% for Liquid Web (Δ +43.12 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 15 (-15).
Also compare
Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Every number on this page came from its checks. Aim one at a website you run and build a 90-day record.
10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.
Stay online, all the time, with Pulsetic's uptime prime.
By Designmodo
Designmodo Inc. 169 Madison Ave, #79627, New York, NY 10016, United States
Copyright © 2010-2026. Pulsetic® is a registered trademark.