Service comparison

Contabo vs. Liquid Web

Contabo vs. Liquid Web — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 18 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Contabo Liquid Web Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
98.31%
+1.69 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
75.16%
+24.84 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
50.54%
+49.46 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Contabo minus Liquid Web). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Contabo

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

  • Liquid Web

    18 total

    9 major 9 minor
    • Median resolution

      20h 4m

    • Longest outage

      623h 37m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Contabo logo

    Contabo

    No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

  • Liquid Web logo

    Liquid Web

    • Jun 26

      Security Advisory: Update Avada Builder and UpdraftPlus WordPress Plugins Immediately

      Ongoing

      Minor
    • Jun 24

      Network Service Impact, Subset of Services, DC3

      2h 50m

      Major
    • Jun 18

      Monitoring Service Degradation

      Ongoing

      Minor
    • Jun 6

      Monitoring Service Degradation

      1d 4h 3m

      Minor
    • May 27

      Phone System Issues

      3h 53m

      Major

Bottom line

Contabo wins

Contabo edges out on 90-day uptime.

Contabo posted 100.00% vs. 50.54% for Liquid Web (Δ +49.46 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 18 (-18).

Monitor any service like this.

Pulsetic watches endpoints from 15+ global regions and alerts you before users notice.