Service comparison

Railway vs. Render

Railway vs. Render — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 24 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Railway Render Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
92.71%
+7.29 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
97.06%
+2.94 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
98.32%
+1.68 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
98.58%
+1.42 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Railway minus Render). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Railway

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

  • Render

    24 total

    10 major 14 minor
    • Median resolution

      44m

    • Longest outage

      12h 14m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Railway logo

    Railway

    No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

  • Render logo

    Render

    • Jun 23

      External connections to Postgres services may terminate intermittently

      1h 45m

      Minor
    • Jun 18

      Slow/failing wildcard certificates related to LetsEncrypt incident

      3h 11m

      Minor
    • Jun 11

      Stuck queued deploys

      49m

      Minor
    • Jun 11

      Failed or delayed autodeploys

      21m

      Minor
    • Jun 11

      Queued deploys stuck

      2h 10m

      Minor

Bottom line

Railway wins

Railway edges out on 90-day uptime.

Railway posted 100.00% vs. 98.58% for Render (Δ +1.42 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 24 (-24).

Monitor any service like this.

Pulsetic watches endpoints from 15+ global regions and alerts you before users notice.