Service comparison

Railway vs. Render

Railway vs. Render: uptime, incident frequency and resolution times, head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 16 incidents total · From each provider's official status page

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Railway Render Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
99.82%
+0.18 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
98.44%
+1.56 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
98.92%
+1.08 pp

Uptime is the share of each window with no incident open on the provider's official status page. Δ is percentage-point difference (Railway minus Render). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Railway

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

      —

    • Longest incident

      —

  • Render

    16 total

    5 major 11 minor
    • Median resolution

      1h 7m

    • Longest incident

      3h 53m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Railway logo

    Railway

    No incidents on record.

  • Render logo

    Render

    • Nov 11

      API Performance Issues

      18m

      Minor
    • Nov 5

      Issues affecting connections to a subset of Postgres Databases

      3h 43m

      Minor
    • Oct 24

      Platform emails not being sent

      29m

      Minor
    • Oct 23

      Degraded network performance

      1h 28m

      Minor
    • Oct 20

      Deploying from GitLab may intermittently fail

      3h 40m

      Minor

Bottom line

Railway wins

Railway edges out on 90-day uptime.

Railway posted 100.00% vs. 98.92% for Render (Δ +1.08 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 16 (-16).

Where would your uptime rank against Railway?

Pulsetic is website uptime monitoring. Aim it at a website you run and build a 90-day record of your own.

10 monitors free, email alerts on failure and recovery. No credit card.