Service comparison

Railway vs. Render

Railway vs. Render — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 21 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Railway Render Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
95.49%
+4.51 pp
Last 7 days
100.00%
98.79%
+1.21 pp
Last 30 days
100.00%
98.92%
+1.08 pp
Last 90 days
100.00%
99.12%
+0.88 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Railway minus Render). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Railway

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

  • Render

    21 total

    10 major 11 minor
    • Median resolution

      49m

    • Longest outage

      3h 11m

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Railway logo

    Railway

    No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

  • Render logo

    Render

    • Jul 15

      Some users enrolled in 2FA are experiencing login issues

      1h 5m

      Major
    • Jul 15

      Render Dashboard Unavailable

      31m

      Major
    • Jul 9

      Some services and datastores in Singapore experiencing brief disruptions

      26m

      Major
    • Jul 2

      Delayed wildcard issuance or renewal

      50m

      Minor
    • Jun 23

      External connections to Postgres services may terminate intermittently

      1h 45m

      Minor

Bottom line

Railway wins

Railway edges out on 90-day uptime.

Railway posted 100.00% vs. 99.12% for Render (Δ +0.88 pp). Incidents: 0 vs. 21 (-21).

Monitor any service like this.

Pulsetic watches endpoints from 15+ global regions and alerts you before users notice.