Service comparison

Supabase vs. Firebase

Supabase vs. Firebase — reliability, API availability, and incident frequency head-to-head.

Last 90 days · 39 incidents total · Data via Pulsetic monitoring

Head-to-head

90-day summary

Uptime over time

Availability across windows

Window Supabase Firebase Δ
Last 24 hours
100.00%
100.00%
0.00 pp
Last 7 days
84.43%
100.00%
-15.57 pp
Last 30 days
19.70%
100.00%
-80.30 pp
Last 90 days
58.85%
100.00%
-41.15 pp

Δ is percentage-point difference (Supabase minus Firebase). Higher is better.

Incidents 90-day

Severity breakdown

  • Supabase

    39 total

    15 major 24 minor
    • Median resolution

      2h 12m

    • Longest outage

      784h 40m

  • Firebase

    0 total

    0 major 0 minor
    • Median resolution

    • Longest outage

Recent activity

Last 5 incidents, side-by-side

  • Supabase logo

    Supabase

    • Jun 19

      Failed to apply network restrictions

      3h 2m

      Minor
    • Jun 18

      DNS record creation failures impacting project creation, restore, pause

      3h 37m

      Major
    • Jun 17

      Hardware failure in us-east

      1h 50m

      Minor
    • Jun 17

      Degraded Management API performance affecting payments and Supabase Studio

      1h 39m

      Major
    • Jun 16

      Project usage analytics API endpoints breakage

      1h 14m

      Minor
  • Firebase logo

    Firebase

    No incidents recorded in the last 90 days.

Bottom line

Firebase wins

Firebase edges out on 90-day uptime.

Supabase posted 58.85% vs. 100.00% for Firebase (Δ -41.15 pp). Incidents: 39 vs. 0 (+39).

Monitor any service like this.

Pulsetic watches endpoints from 15+ global regions and alerts you before users notice.